Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 16.05.241 (2026)

Powers excluded

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 16.05.241. Powers excluded.
The boards have regulation-making powers as set out in this chapter, but do not have administrative, budgeting, or fiscal powers.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1981–2023 · leading case: Kodiak Seafood Processors Ass'n v. State, 900 P.2d 1191 (Alaska 1995).
Kodiak Seafood Processors Ass'n v. State, 900 P.2d 1191 (Alaska 1995). “AS 16.05.241. In this case, when we discuss actions taken by ADF & G we are referring to actions taken by the Commissioner of ADF & G, or by employees of the Department acting under his authority.”
Peninsula Mktg. Ass'n v. Rosier, 890 P.2d 567 (Alaska 1995). · cites it 2× “050; AS 16.05.241; AS 16.05.251. It would make insignificant the statutory device for resolving disagreements between the Board and the Commissioner.”
Sitka Tribe of Alaska v. State of Alaska, Alaska Dep't of Fish & Game, & Se. Herring Conservation All., 540 P.3d 893 (Alaska 2023). “050 (granting Department commissioner authority “to collect, classify, and disseminate statistics, data and information”). 14 5 AAC 01.”
Kenai Pen. Fisherman's Co-op. Ass'n v. State, 628 P.2d 897 (Alaska 1981). “[8] AS 16.05.241 provides: The boards have regulation-making powers as set out in this chapter, but do not have administrative, budgeting or fiscal powers.”
Kenai Peninsula Fisherman's Coop. Ass'n v. State, 628 P.2d 897 (Alaska 1981). “AS 16.05.241 provides: The boards have regulation-making powers as set out in this chapter, but do not have administrative, budgeting or fiscal powers.”
Grunert v. Campbell, 248 F. App'x 775 (9th Cir. 2007). “See Alaska Stat. § 16.05.241 (2007). The Board could not make an ad hoc ruling because it has no power to rule on individual permits: that power is granted to the Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.