Alaska Stat. » Chapter 21.36
Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 21.36.320 (2026)

[Renumbered as

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 21.36.320. [Renumbered as AS 21.36.910.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1988–2025 · leading case: State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Nicholson, 777 P.2d 1152 (Alaska 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Nicholson, 777 P.2d 1152 (Alaska 1989). · cites it 4× “See AS 21.36.320; 21.90.020. The preemption provision cited by State Farm involves political subdivisions of the state and in no way addresses the issue of damages against insurance companies in civil actions.”
O.K. Lumber Co. v. Providence Washington Ins. Co., 759 P.2d 523 (Alaska 1988). · cites it 3× “AS 21.36.320. The director may also seek in-junctive relief.”
Ace v. Aetna Life Ins., 40 F. Supp. 2d 1125 (D. Alaska 1999). · cites it 4× “At oral argument, Ace asserted that the maximum civil penalty is $1- million, not $250,000.”
Moda Assurance Co. v. New Life Treatment Ctr. (D. Alaska 2025). “080; then citing § 21.36.320.; then citing § 21.36.330; and then citing § 21.”
— Alaska Stat. § 21.36.320(1) — 1 case
Ace v. Aetna Life Ins., 40 F. Supp. 2d 1125 (D. Alaska 1999). “At oral argument, Ace asserted that the maximum civil penalty is $1- million, not $250,000.”
— Alaska Stat. § 21.36.320(c) — 1 case
State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Nicholson, 777 P.2d 1152 (Alaska 1989). “See AS 21.36.320; 21.90.020. The preemption provision cited by State Farm involves political subdivisions of the state and in no way addresses the issue of damages against insurance companies in civil actions.”
— Alaska Stat. § 21.36.320(d) — 2 cases
O.K. Lumber Co. v. Providence Washington Ins. Co., 759 P.2d 523 (Alaska 1988). “AS 21.36.320. The director may also seek in-junctive relief.”
State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Nicholson, 777 P.2d 1152 (Alaska 1989). “See AS 21.36.320; 21.90.020. The preemption provision cited by State Farm involves political subdivisions of the state and in no way addresses the issue of damages against insurance companies in civil actions.”
— Alaska Stat. § 21.36.320(d)(e) — 1 case
Ace v. Aetna Life Ins., 40 F. Supp. 2d 1125 (D. Alaska 1999). “At oral argument, Ace asserted that the maximum civil penalty is $1- million, not $250,000.”
— Alaska Stat. § 21.36.320(e) — 2 cases
O.K. Lumber Co. v. Providence Washington Ins. Co., 759 P.2d 523 (Alaska 1988). “AS 21.36.320. The director may also seek in-junctive relief.”
Ace v. Aetna Life Ins., 40 F. Supp. 2d 1125 (D. Alaska 1999). “At oral argument, Ace asserted that the maximum civil penalty is $1- million, not $250,000.”
— Alaska Stat. § 21.36.320(f) — 1 case
Ace v. Aetna Life Ins., 40 F. Supp. 2d 1125 (D. Alaska 1999). “At oral argument, Ace asserted that the maximum civil penalty is $1- million, not $250,000.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.