Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 22.07.030 (2026)
Review by supreme court
✓ text as last checked Sept. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 22.07.030. Review by supreme court.
A party may apply to the supreme court for review of a final decision of the court of appeals in accordance with AS 22.05.010 and rules adopted by the supreme court. Review is in the discretion of the supreme court as set out in AS 22.05.010(d). In this section, “final decision” means a decision or order, other than a dismissal by consent of all parties, that closes a matter in the court of appeals.
A party may apply to the supreme court for review of a final decision of the court of appeals in accordance with AS 22.05.010 and rules adopted by the supreme court. Review is in the discretion of the supreme court as set out in AS 22.05.010(d). In this section, “final decision” means a decision or order, other than a dismissal by consent of all parties, that closes a matter in the court of appeals.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1983–2025 · leading case: Elson v. State, 659 P.2d 1195 (Alaska 1983).
Elson v. State, 659 P.2d 1195 (Alaska 1983). “[2] AS 22.07.030 and Appellate Rule 302(a)(1).”
Copelin v. State, 659 P.2d 1206 (Alaska 1983). “[2] AS 22.07.030 and Appellate Rule 302(a)(1).”
Marlon Mack v. State of Alaska, 523 P.3d 1235 (Alaska Ct. App. 2023). “010(d) & AS 22.07.030, with AS 22.07.020(d). 46 See AS 22.”
State v. Seigle, 394 P.3d 627 (Alaska Ct. App. 2017). “See also AS 22.07.030 ("In this section, ’final . decision’ means a decision or order, other than a dismissal by consent of all parties, that closes a matter in the court of appeals.”
Yako William Collins v. State of Alaska, 568 P.3d 349 (Alaska 2025). “126 In accordance with these principles, the Washington Supreme Court has continued to emphasize the importance of respect between the branches, highlighting the legislature’s authority to disapprove of court decisions and reject their reasoning even retroactively — but only as…”
Thompson v. Cordle, No. 3:23-cv-00115 (D. Alaska Aug. 7, 2023). “31 See Alaska Stat. § 22.07.030 (providing that “[a] party may apply to the supreme court for review of a final decision of the court of appeals”); Alaska R.”
Lee v. State of Alaska, No. 1:23-cv-00012 (D. Alaska Nov. 13, 2023). “31 See Alaska Stat. § 22.07.030 (providing that “[a] party may apply to the supreme court for review of a final decision of the court of appeals”); Alaska R.”
Carney v. State of Alaska D.A., No. 3:24-cv-00025 (D. Alaska Mar. 4, 2024). “36 See Alaska Stat. § 22.07.030 (providing that “[a] party may apply to the supreme court for review of a final decision of the court of appeals”); Alaska R.”
Carney v. State of Alaska D.A., No. 3:24-cv-00024 (D. Alaska Mar. 4, 2024). “36 See Alaska Stat. § 22.07.030 (providing that “[a] party may apply to the supreme court for review of a final decision of the court of appeals”); Alaska R.”
Allen v. State of Alaska, No. 3:24-cv-00184 (D. Alaska Sept. 27, 2024). “23 See Alaska Stat. § 22.07.030 (providing that “[a] party may apply to the supreme court for review of a final decision of the court of appeals”); Alaska R.”
State v. Seigle, No. 2545 A-11473 (Alaska Ct. App. Mar. 17, 2017). “22 22 See also AS 22.07.030 (“In this section, ‘final decision’ means a decision or order, other than a dismissal by consent of all parties, that closes a matter in the court of appeals.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.