Alaska Stat. » Chapter 25.24
Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 25.24.300 (2026)

[Renumbered as

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 25.24.300. [Renumbered as AS 25.20.140.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1985–2015 · leading case: Smith v. Groleske, 196 P.3d 1102 (Alaska 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Smith v. Groleske, 196 P.3d 1102 (Alaska 2008). · cites it 3× “Before 1990 awards of attorney's fees for both denial of visitation sanctions and actions to enforce visitation were governed by the same provision, AS 25.24.300. 14 The legislature then enacted AS 25.”
Kessler v. Kessler, 827 P.2d 1119 (Alaska 1992). · cites it 2× “140 (formerly AS 25.24.300), [2] we held that attorney's fees should only be awarded against a party who brings such an action "willfully and without just excuse.”
Gerlach v. State, 699 P.2d 358 (Alaska Ct. App. 1985). “See AS 25.24.300 (custodian’s obligation to permit visitation in conformance with court order), AS 47.”
Susan M. v. Paul H., 362 P.3d 460 (Alaska 2015). · cites it 2× “55,238 and AS 25.24.300. There has been no change to the language during these renumberings.”
L.L.M. v. P.M., 754 P.2d 262 (Alaska 1988). · cites it 2× “In fashioning an appropriate standard we take guidance from AS 25.24.300 which states in part: Action for failure to permit visitation with minor child, (a) When a court order is specific as to when a custodian of a minor child must permit another person to have visitation with…”
Llm v. Pm, 754 P.2d 262 (Alaska 1988). · cites it 3× “In fashioning an appropriate standard we take guidance from AS 25.24.300 which states in part: Action for failure to permit visitation with minor child.”
— Alaska Stat. § 25.24.300(b) — 2 cases
L.L.M. v. P.M., 754 P.2d 262 (Alaska 1988). “In fashioning an appropriate standard we take guidance from AS 25.24.300 which states in part: Action for failure to permit visitation with minor child, (a) When a court order is specific as to when a custodian of a minor child must permit another person to have visitation with…”
Llm v. Pm, 754 P.2d 262 (Alaska 1988). “In fashioning an appropriate standard we take guidance from AS 25.24.300 which states in part: Action for failure to permit visitation with minor child.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.