Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 28.35.045 (2026)
[Renumbered as
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases, 1979–2016 · leading case: Comeau v. State, 758 P.2d 108 (Alaska Ct. App. 1988).
Comeau v. State, 758 P.2d 108 (Alaska Ct. App. 1988). “In comparison, Alaska's negligent driving statute, AS 28.35.045, [9] may be satisfied by proof of an "unjustifiable risk of harm," as opposed to the "substantial and unjustifiable" risk required for reckless driving.”
State v. Fyfe, 370 P.3d 1092 (Alaska 2016). “040 or negligent driving under AS 28.35.045 within a highway work zone, notwithstanding the amount of the fine or the maximum fine set under this title, the fine, or maximum fine, is double the amount provided in this title,[ 17 ] This original bill was thus limited in scope,…”
Williford v. State, 674 P.2d 1329 (Alaska 1983). “040; AS 28.35.045 (reckless or negligent driving forbidden, regardless of what might have caused such driving).”
Hillman v. Mun. of Anchorage, 941 P.2d 211 (Alaska Ct. App. 1997). “135(b)), or when a district court judge sentenced a defendant to 30 days for negligent driving (an offense that is not punishable by impris onment — see AS 28.35.045(c); AS 28.40.050(c)-(d)). Moreover, we note that AS 22.”
Creary v. State, 663 P.2d 226 (Alaska Ct. App. 1983). “On December 21, 1981, almost a month after the accident, the state filed a complaint against McGrady charging him with negligent driving under AS 28.35.045(a). The complaint stated in part: HAROLD McGRADY did unlawfully operate a motor vehicle, to-wit: a road grader, in the…”
Fyfe v. State, 334 P.3d 183 (Alaska Ct. App. 2014). “040 or negligent driving under AS 28.35.045 within a highway work zone, notwithstanding the amount of the fine or the maximum fine set under this title, the fine, or maxi *186 mum fine, is double the amount provided in this title.”
McCollum v. State, 808 P.2d 268 (Alaska Ct. App. 1991). “AS 28.35.045. McCollum appeals the denial of his motion to suppress.”
State v. Burke, 714 P.2d 374 (Alaska Ct. App. 1986). “See AS 28.35.045. While the magistrate was correct that these were not "crimes," see AS 28.”
Carlson v. State, 676 P.2d 603 (Alaska Ct. App. 1984). “” See AS 28.35.045(c). The legislature has stated that an infraction is not a criminal offense.”
State v. GLP, 590 P.2d 65 (Alaska 1979). “040 (Reckless driving); and AS 28.35.045 (Negligent driving). [9] The legislature has explained the purposes underlying the code chapter which includes juvenile court jurisdiction in the following statutory language: The purpose of this chapter is to secure for each minor the…”
— Alaska Stat. § 28.35.045(a) — 2 cases
Comeau v. State, 758 P.2d 108 (Alaska Ct. App. 1988). “In comparison, Alaska's negligent driving statute, AS 28.35.045, [9] may be satisfied by proof of an "unjustifiable risk of harm," as opposed to the "substantial and unjustifiable" risk required for reckless driving.”
Creary v. State, 663 P.2d 226 (Alaska Ct. App. 1983). “On December 21, 1981, almost a month after the accident, the state filed a complaint against McGrady charging him with negligent driving under AS 28.35.045(a). The complaint stated in part: HAROLD McGRADY did unlawfully operate a motor vehicle, to-wit: a road grader, in the…”
— Alaska Stat. § 28.35.045(b) — 1 case
Comeau v. State, 758 P.2d 108 (Alaska Ct. App. 1988). “In comparison, Alaska's negligent driving statute, AS 28.35.045, [9] may be satisfied by proof of an "unjustifiable risk of harm," as opposed to the "substantial and unjustifiable" risk required for reckless driving.”
— Alaska Stat. § 28.35.045(c) — 2 cases
Hillman v. Mun. of Anchorage, 941 P.2d 211 (Alaska Ct. App. 1997). “135(b)), or when a district court judge sentenced a defendant to 30 days for negligent driving (an offense that is not punishable by impris onment — see AS 28.35.045(c); AS 28.40.050(c)-(d)). Moreover, we note that AS 22.”
Carlson v. State, 676 P.2d 603 (Alaska Ct. App. 1984). “” See AS 28.35.045(c). The legislature has stated that an infraction is not a criminal offense.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.