Alaska Stat. » Chapter 33.20
Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 33.20.020 (2026)

Good time. [Repealed, § 21 ch 166 SLA 1978.]

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 33.20.020. Good time. [Repealed, § 21 ch 166 SLA 1978.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1975–1994 · leading case: McGinnis v. Stevens, 543 P.2d 1221 (Alaska 1975).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
McGinnis v. Stevens, 543 P.2d 1221 (Alaska 1975). · cites it 2× “020(b) ; and good time earned for work performed, AS 33.20.020(a). 3 .One of the arguments advanced by the state in this appeal is that the superior court’s comprehensive specification of procedural rights, including stringent deadlines (some within hours) for stages of the…”
State v. McCallion, 875 P.2d 93 (Alaska Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “Under former AS 33.20.020, ch. 107, § 2, SLA 1960, repealed by ch.”
State v. Staael, 807 P.2d 513 (Alaska Ct. App. 1991). “010; AS 33.20.020. Approximately five months pri- or to his release, Staael was notified that he was subject to mandatory parole and that general, standard and special conditions of parole would be imposed on him.”
Gant v. State, 654 P.2d 1325 (Alaska Ct. App. 1982). “He apparently discovered the next day that about $900 was missing from the cash register. Gant had access to the cash register and was the only employee continuously present that evening.”
— Alaska Stat. § 33.20.020(a) — 1 case
McGinnis v. Stevens, 543 P.2d 1221 (Alaska 1975). “020(b) ; and good time earned for work performed, AS 33.20.020(a). 3 .One of the arguments advanced by the state in this appeal is that the superior court’s comprehensive specification of procedural rights, including stringent deadlines (some within hours) for stages of the…”
— Alaska Stat. § 33.20.020(b) — 1 case
McGinnis v. Stevens, 543 P.2d 1221 (Alaska 1975). “020(b) ; and good time earned for work performed, AS 33.20.020(a). 3 .One of the arguments advanced by the state in this appeal is that the superior court’s comprehensive specification of procedural rights, including stringent deadlines (some within hours) for stages of the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.