Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 36.30.690 (2026)
Exclusive remedy
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 36.30.690. Exclusive remedy.
Notwithstanding AS 44.77 or other law to the contrary, AS 36.30.560 — 36.30.699 and regulations adopted under those sections provide the exclusive procedure for asserting a claim against an agency arising in relation to a procurement under this chapter.
Notwithstanding AS 44.77 or other law to the contrary, AS 36.30.560 — 36.30.699 and regulations adopted under those sections provide the exclusive procedure for asserting a claim against an agency arising in relation to a procurement under this chapter.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2009–2016 · leading case: Alii Sec. Sys., Inc. v. Prof'l Sec. Consultants, 383 P.3d 104 (Haw. App. 2016).
Alii Sec. Sys., Inc. v. Prof'l Sec. Consultants, 383 P.3d 104 (Haw. App. 2016). “The Procurement Code as a whole, taking into account the legislative history and context, suggests that the Exclusive Remedy Provision is only intended to limit remedies that a bidder can bring against the governmental agency.”
Commc'ns-Pac., Inc. v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 221 P.3d 505 (Haw. App. 2009). “See Alaska Stat. § 36.30.690 (2009), Ariz.Rev.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.