Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 42.05.371 (2026)

Adherence to tariffs

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 42.05.371. Adherence to tariffs.
The terms and conditions under which a public utility offers its services and facilities to the public shall be governed strictly by the provisions of its currently effective tariffs. A legally filed and effective tariff rate, charge, toll, rental, rule, regulation, or condition of service may not be changed except in the manner provided in this chapter. If more than one tariff rate or charge can reasonably be applied for billing purposes the one most advantageous to the customer shall be used.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1979–2007 · leading case: Matanuska Elec. Ass'n v. Chugach Elec. Ass'n, 53 P.3d 578 (Alaska 2002).
Matanuska Elec. Ass'n v. Chugach Elec. Ass'n, 53 P.3d 578 (Alaska 2002). · cites it 2× “AS 42.05.371. 4 . As MEA notes, under 3 AAC 48.”
United States v. RCA Alaska Commc'ns, Inc., 597 P.2d 489 (Alaska 1979). · cites it 2× “No legally filed and effective tariff rate, charge, toll, rental, rule, regulation or condition of service shall be changed except in the manner provided in this chapter.”
Far North Sanitation, Inc. v. Alaska Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 825 P.2d 867 (Alaska 1992). “Therefore, under AS 42.05.371, APUC erred by failing to hold a hearing before its 1986 adoption of the interim refundable rate.”
Alaska Pub. Utils. Comm'n v. Mun. of Anchorage, 902 P.2d 783 (Alaska 1995). · cites it 3× “AS 42.05.371, 1 .381(a), 2 .391(c), 3 .411(a), 4 .”
Uncle Joe's Inc. v. LM Berry & Co., 156 P.3d 1113 (Alaska 2007). “AS 42.05.371. 14 . Adams v. N. Ill. Gas Co.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.