Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 44.62.195 (2026)
Fiscal notes on regulations
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 44.62.195. Fiscal notes on regulations.
If the adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation would require increased appropriations by the state, the department or agency affected shall prepare an estimate of the appropriation increase for the fiscal year following adoption, amendment, or repeal of the regulation and for at least two succeeding fiscal years.
If the adoption, amendment, or repeal of a regulation would require increased appropriations by the state, the department or agency affected shall prepare an estimate of the appropriation increase for the fiscal year following adoption, amendment, or repeal of the regulation and for at least two succeeding fiscal years.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1990–2004 · leading case: Mech. Contractors of Alaska, Inc. v. State, Dep't of Pub. Saf., 91 P.3d 240 (Alaska 2004).
Mech. Contractors of Alaska, Inc. v. State, Dep't of Pub. Saf., 91 P.3d 240 (Alaska 2004). “, so here we address only whether the departments failed to provide a fiscal note as required by AS 44.62.195. 1. Were DPS and DCED required to prepare a fiscal note? Alaska Statute 44.”
Gilbert v. State, Dep't of Fish & Game, Bd. of Fisheries, 803 P.2d 391 (Alaska 1990). “particular code section or other provisions of law that are being implemented, interpreted or made specific; (3) an informative summary of the proposed subject of agency action; (4) other matters prescribed by a statute applicable to the specific agency or to the specific…”
Turpin v. North Slope Borough, 879 P.2d 1009 (Alaska 1994). “” Given this much evidence that opening the Dalton Highway to unrestricted travel by the general public will require additional appropriations, we hold that the superior court did not err in concluding that DOT acted arbitrarily and capriciously in failing to substantially…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.