Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 44.62.280 (2026)
Purpose of
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 44.62.280. Purpose of AS 44.62.180 — 44.62.290.
It is the purpose of AS 44.62.180 — 44.62.290 to establish basic minimum procedural requirements for the adoption, amendment, or repeal of administrative regulations. Except as provided in AS 44.62.250, AS 44.62.180 — 44.62.290 apply to the exercise of quasi-legislative power conferred by a statute, but nothing in AS 44.62.180 — 44.62.290 repeals or diminishes additional requirements imposed by the statute. AS 44.62.180 — 44.62.290 are not superseded or modified by subsequent legislation except to the extent that the legislation does so expressly.
It is the purpose of AS 44.62.180 — 44.62.290 to establish basic minimum procedural requirements for the adoption, amendment, or repeal of administrative regulations. Except as provided in AS 44.62.250, AS 44.62.180 — 44.62.290 apply to the exercise of quasi-legislative power conferred by a statute, but nothing in AS 44.62.180 — 44.62.290 repeals or diminishes additional requirements imposed by the statute. AS 44.62.180 — 44.62.290 are not superseded or modified by subsequent legislation except to the extent that the legislation does so expressly.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1997–2026 · leading case: Smart v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., 237 P.3d 1010 (Alaska 2010).
Smart v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., 237 P.3d 1010 (Alaska 2010). “AS 44.62.280. Specifically, an agency must provide notice of the proposed regulation, AS 44.”
North Slope Borough & North Slope Borough Sch. Dist. v. State of Alaska, Dep't of Educ. & Early Dev., 484 P.3d 106 (Alaska 2021). “”54 53 AS 44.62.280. 54 Friends of Willow Lake, Inc.”
Kachemak Bay Watch, Inc. v. Noah, 935 P.2d 816 (Alaska 1997). “See AS 44.62.280. Whether the agency action is a regulation is a question of law that does not involve agency expertise.”
Smart v. State, 237 P.3d 1010 (Alaska 2010). “As counsel for Smart conceded at oral argument, we need not address the hearing issue given DHSS's representations.”
Mun. of Anchorage, formerly d/b/a Mun. Light & Power Dep't v. State of Alaska, Dep't of Revenue (Alaska 2026). “” 97 “Requiring that every agency 90 AS 44.62.280 (“It is the purpose of AS 44.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.