Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 45.25.465 (2026)

Sales of used motor vehicles; required disclosures

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 45.25.465. Sales of used motor vehicles; required disclosures.
 (a) Before the sale of a used motor vehicle, a motor vehicle dealer shall,
     (1) when obtaining a used motor vehicle from an individual consumer, make a reasonable inquiry of the seller into the condition of the vehicle, including the accident and repair history of the vehicle; the information shall be recorded in writing and signed by the seller; the dealer shall provide this information to a prospective purchaser of the vehicle;

     (2) when a motor vehicle dealer obtains a used motor vehicle from another motor vehicle dealer, a wholesaler, or an auction, disclose to a prospective purchaser of the vehicle that the vehicle was purchased from another dealer, a wholesaler, or an auction.

 (b) Nothing in this section creates an express warranty by the dealer.

 (c) [Repealed, § 1 ch 56 SLA 2008.]




Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2009–2009 · leading case: Neese v. Lithia Chrysler Jeep of Anchorage, Inc., 210 P.3d 1213 (Alaska 2009).
Neese v. Lithia Chrysler Jeep of Anchorage, Inc., 210 P.3d 1213 (Alaska 2009). · cites it 8× “" The complaint alleged that "defendants have routinely breached the disclosure requirements set forth in AS 45.25.465 [disclosure of accident, repair, and purchase history] and AS 45.”
Neese v. State, 218 P.3d 983 (Alaska 2009). · cites it 7× “The complaints attacked Lithia's failure to disclose information regarding vehicles sold to consumers in violation of AS 45.25.465 and its practice of charging consumers a $200 document preparation fee in violation of AS 45.”
Neese v. Lithia Chrysler Jeep of Anchorage, 210 P.3d 1213 (Alaska 2009). · cites it 9× “" The complaint alleged that "defendants have routinely breached the disclosure requirements set forth in AS 45.25.465 [disclosure of accident, repair, and purchase history] and AS 45.”
— Alaska Stat. § 45.25.465(a) — 3 cases
Neese v. Lithia Chrysler Jeep of Anchorage, Inc., 210 P.3d 1213 (Alaska 2009). “" The complaint alleged that "defendants have routinely breached the disclosure requirements set forth in AS 45.25.465 [disclosure of accident, repair, and purchase history] and AS 45.”
Neese v. State, 218 P.3d 983 (Alaska 2009). “The complaints attacked Lithia's failure to disclose information regarding vehicles sold to consumers in violation of AS 45.25.465 and its practice of charging consumers a $200 document preparation fee in violation of AS 45.”
Neese v. Lithia Chrysler Jeep of Anchorage, 210 P.3d 1213 (Alaska 2009). “" The complaint alleged that "defendants have routinely breached the disclosure requirements set forth in AS 45.25.465 [disclosure of accident, repair, and purchase history] and AS 45.”
— Alaska Stat. § 45.25.465(a)(1) — 2 cases
Neese v. Lithia Chrysler Jeep of Anchorage, Inc., 210 P.3d 1213 (Alaska 2009). “" The complaint alleged that "defendants have routinely breached the disclosure requirements set forth in AS 45.25.465 [disclosure of accident, repair, and purchase history] and AS 45.”
Neese v. Lithia Chrysler Jeep of Anchorage, 210 P.3d 1213 (Alaska 2009). “" The complaint alleged that "defendants have routinely breached the disclosure requirements set forth in AS 45.25.465 [disclosure of accident, repair, and purchase history] and AS 45.”
— Alaska Stat. § 45.25.465(a)(2) — 3 cases
Neese v. Lithia Chrysler Jeep of Anchorage, Inc., 210 P.3d 1213 (Alaska 2009). “" The complaint alleged that "defendants have routinely breached the disclosure requirements set forth in AS 45.25.465 [disclosure of accident, repair, and purchase history] and AS 45.”
Neese v. State, 218 P.3d 983 (Alaska 2009). “The complaints attacked Lithia's failure to disclose information regarding vehicles sold to consumers in violation of AS 45.25.465 and its practice of charging consumers a $200 document preparation fee in violation of AS 45.”
Neese v. Lithia Chrysler Jeep of Anchorage, 210 P.3d 1213 (Alaska 2009). “" The complaint alleged that "defendants have routinely breached the disclosure requirements set forth in AS 45.25.465 [disclosure of accident, repair, and purchase history] and AS 45.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.