Alaska Stat. » Chapter 45.50
Alaska Statutes

Alaska Stat. § 45.50.564 (2026)

Monopolies and attempted monopolies unlawful

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AK-LEGakleg.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 45.50.564. Monopolies and attempted monopolies unlawful.
It is unlawful for a person to monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or combine or conspire with another person to monopolize any part of trade or commerce.


Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1983–2025 · leading case: Betz v. Chena Hot Springs Grp., 742 P.2d 1346 (Alaska 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Betz v. Chena Hot Springs Grp., 742 P.2d 1346 (Alaska 1987). · cites it 11× “§ 2 , and that a similar interpretation should be given to AS 45.50.564 under West v. Whitney-Fidalgo Seafoods, Inc.”
Odom v. Fairbanks Mem'l Hosp., 999 P.2d 123 (Alaska 2000). · cites it 10× “562 and AS 45.50.564. He raises three claims: (1) unreasonable restraint of trade, [2] (2) group boycott, [3] and (3) unlawful monopoly.”
Kos v. Alyeska Pipeline Serv. Co., 676 P.2d 1069 (Alaska 1983). · cites it 3× “562 (prohibiting combinations or conspiracies in restraint of trade) and AS 45.50.564 (prohibiting monopolies). In the superior court, KOS contended that Alyeska, alone and in concert with Sohio and ARCO, engaged in a price fixing scheme to control rates for motor carrier…”
Hallam v. Alaska Airlines, Inc., 91 P.3d 279 (Alaska 2004). “562 and AS 45.50.564 that Alaska Airlines “has attempted to contract, conspire, and combine” with other airlines “to monopolize air travel in this region” and “restraint ] free trade.”
Sisters of Providence v. A.A. Pain Clinic, Inc., 81 P.3d 989 (Alaska 2003). “562, and one for attempted monopolization in violation of AS 45.50.564. A jury trial ensued. On a special verdict form the jury reached a verdict that was generally favorable to the plaintiffs.”
Odom v. Lee, 999 P.2d 755 (Alaska 2000). · cites it 2× “562 are also referred to as Sherman Act § 1 claims; claims under AS 45.50.564 have been termed Sherman Act § 2 claims.”
Petroleum Sales, Ltd. v. Mapco Alaska, Inc., 687 P.2d 923 (Alaska 1984). “AS 45.50.564 prohibits monopolization or attempts to monopolize or combinations or conspiracies to monopolize.”
Crowley Marine Servs., Inc., Crowley Mar. Corp., Northland Fuel, LLC, Yukon Fuel Co., Northland Vessel Leasing Co., LLC, & Yutana Barge Lines, LLC v. State of Alaska & Delta W., LLC, Crowley Fuels LLC v. Delta W. LLC F/K/A Delta W., Inc. (Alaska 2025). “471; AS 45.50.564; AS 45.50.568. 3 See AS 45.50.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.