Alaska Statutes
Alaska Stat. § 47.10.014 (2026)
Neglect
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
AK-LEGakleg.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 47.10.014. Neglect.
For purposes of this chapter, the court may find neglect of a child if the parent, guardian, or custodian fails to provide the child with adequate food, clothing, shelter, education, medical attention, or other care and control necessary for the child's physical and mental health and development, though financially able to do so or offered financial or other reasonable means to do so.
For purposes of this chapter, the court may find neglect of a child if the parent, guardian, or custodian fails to provide the child with adequate food, clothing, shelter, education, medical attention, or other care and control necessary for the child's physical and mental health and development, though financially able to do so or offered financial or other reasonable means to do so.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19
cases (4 in the last 5 years), 2002–2026 · leading case: Jeff AC, Jr. v. State, 117 P.3d 697 (Alaska 2005).
Jeff AC, Jr. v. State, 117 P.3d 697 (Alaska 2005). “013(a)(2)-(3), that he neglected her under AS 47.10.014, that he has not remedied these conditions, that the state made reasonable efforts "to provide appropriate family services, based on the facts and circumstances of the case" and to achieve permanency for the child, and that…”
Audrey H. v. State, Off. of Child.'s Servs., 188 P.3d 668 (Alaska 2008). “each child has been subjected to neglect by [Audrey], as defined in AS 47.10.014, and thus are children in need of aid, pursuant to [AS 47.”
Duke S. v. State, Dept. of Health & Soc. Servs., Off. of Child.'s Servs., 433 P.3d 1127 (Alaska 2018). “26 AS 47.10.014. 27 AS 47.10.084(a). 28 The OCS caseworker who testified at the termination trial conceded that a paucity of visitation due to OCS's overstretched resources "may feel like a punishment to the parents" but did not amount to "neglect to the kids, no.”
Payton S. v. State, Dept. of Health & Soc. Servs., Off. of Child.'s Servs., 349 P.3d 162 (Alaska 2015). “011(1) 8 (6), 9 (8), 10 and (10), 11 and AS 47.10.014. 12 The court found that (1) the children had been subjected to conduct or conditions described in AS 47.”
Charles S. v. Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs. , Off. of Child.'s Servs., 442 P.3d 780 (Alaska 2019). “" AS 47.10.014. After OCS takes custody of a child, the parents retain "residual rights and responsibilities" such as the right and responsibility to visit their children, to consent to adoption, and to consent to major medical treatment.”
Annette H. v. State of Alaska, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Off. of Child.'s Servs., 450 P.3d 259 (Alaska 2019). “24 AS 47.10.014. 25 In addition to subsection (9) of AS 47.”
Dale H. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., 235 P.3d 203 (Alaska 2010). “" AS 47.10.014 defines "neglect" for the purposes of the statute.”
Neal M. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Off. of Child.'s Servs., 214 P.3d 284 (Alaska 2009). “AS 47.10.014. 13 . Audrey H. v. State, Office of Children's Servs.”
P.M. v. State, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Div. of Fam. & Youth Servs., 42 P.3d 1127 (Alaska 2002). “0183 and had neglected the child under AS 47.10.014. The court specifically found that P.”
Justin D. v. State of Alaska, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Off. of Child.'s Servs., Cora G. v. State of Alaska, Dep't of Health & Soc. Servs., Off. of Child.'s Servs. (Alaska 2023). “Finally, the superior court found that termination of the parents’ rights was in Carlos’s best interests, and the court terminated their parental rights. STANDARD OF REVIEW Whether a superior court’s CINA findings satisfy the relevant statutory requirements is a question of law…”
Pm v. State, Dept. of Hlth. & Soc. Servs., 42 P.3d 1127 (Alaska 2002). “013 and had neglected the child under AS 47.10.014. The court specifically found that P.”
Kendra H. v. State of Alaska, DHSS, OCS (Alaska 2020). “” AS 47.10.014. 10 AS 47.10.011(11) states that a court may find a child to be in need of aid if “the parent .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.