Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 12
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-346 (2026)

Statement of costs; service and objections

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. The party in whose favor judgment is rendered and who claims costs shall file a verified statement of his costs and serve a copy thereof on the opposing party. The statement shall be filed and served within ten days after judgment, unless for good cause shown the time is extended by the court.

B. At any time within five days after receipt of the copy of the statement of costs, the opposing party may file objections to the statement, serving a copy thereof on the party claiming such costs. The court shall pass upon the objections and by its order correct the statement of costs to the extent that it requires correction.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1967–2017 · leading case: Nat'l Broker Assocs., Inc. v. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc., 119 P.3d 477 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nat'l Broker Assocs., Inc. v. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc., 119 P.3d 477 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 3× “¶ 38 NBA also argues that the attorneys’ fees claim for defending the merits was untimely because Marlyn did not submit it within twenty days of the decision on the merits, as required by Rule 54(g), and the claim for costs was untimely because Marlyn did not submit it within…”
Brant v. Hargrove, 632 P.2d 978 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1981). · cites it 4× “A.R.S. § 12-346 and Rule 54(f), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.”
Town of Paradise Valley v. Gulf Leisure Corp., 557 P.2d 532 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1976). · cites it 2× “AWARD OF COSTS TO APPELLEES As admitted by the appellees in their brief, they failed to file a statement of their costs within ten days after rendition of the summary judgment, as required by A.R.S. § 12-346. They thus were precluded from recovering their costs as awarded by the…”
Trimble Cattle Co. v. Henry, 592 P.2d 1310 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1979). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 12-346(A) provides: “The party in whose favor judgment is rendered and who claims costs shall file a verified statement of his costs and serve a copy thereof on the opposing party.”
City of Phoenix v. Santa Anita Dev. Corp., 685 P.2d 1331 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 2× “They point out that A.R.S. § 12-346 requires that the statement of costs “be filed and served within ten days after judgment, unless for good cause shown the time is extended by the court.”
O'Malley Inv. & Realty Co. v. Trimble, 427 P.2d 926 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1967). · cites it 4× “” As authority for their position, they cite A.R.S. § 12-346 which provides for the filing of a statement of costs “within ten days after judgment.”
Burns v. Wheeler, 446 P.2d 925 (Ariz. 1968). “§ 12-346. He failed to do so, and admits in his brief that this failure was “in all probability through an oversight.”
First Nat'l Bank v. Otis Elevator Co., 445 P.2d 848 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1968). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 12-346 and Rule 13(a), Rules of the Supreme Court, 17 A.”
Merrick v. Escapule, No. 1 CA-CV 15-0699 (Ariz. Ct. App. Nov. 8, 2016). · cites it 2× “§ 12-341; see also A.R.S. § 12-346(A) (directing that a statement of costs be filed by “[t]he party in whose favor judgment is rendered”).”
Orosco v. McShcd, No. 1 CA-CV 15-0580 (Ariz. Ct. App. Feb. 2, 2017). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 12-346(A) (2017). When the Oroscos timely submitted their statement of costs, they omitted the requisite accompanying verification, but they submitted the verification with their reply.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-346(A): 3 cases
Trimble Cattle Co. v. Henry, 592 P.2d 1310 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1979). “A.R.S. § 12-346(A) provides: “The party in whose favor judgment is rendered and who claims costs shall file a verified statement of his costs and serve a copy thereof on the opposing party.”
Merrick v. Escapule, No. 1 CA-CV 15-0699 (Ariz. Ct. App. Nov. 8, 2016). “§ 12-341; see also A.R.S. § 12-346(A) (directing that a statement of costs be filed by “[t]he party in whose favor judgment is rendered”).”
Orosco v. McShcd, No. 1 CA-CV 15-0580 (Ariz. Ct. App. Feb. 2, 2017). “A.R.S. § 12-346(A) (2017). When the Oroscos timely submitted their statement of costs, they omitted the requisite accompanying verification, but they submitted the verification with their reply.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.