Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 12
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 12-347 (2026)

Inclusion of costs and interest in judgment

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The clerk of the court shall include in the judgment entered by him the costs and interest on the verdict from the time it was rendered.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1973–2021 · leading case: In re United States Currency In Amount of $26,980.00, 18 P.3d 85 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re United States Currency In Amount of $26,980.00, 18 P.3d 85 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 3× “” It does not support an award of prejudgment interest from the date of the seizure. Gilbert also claims that Pima County brought “[a] portion of this matter” under A.”
Metzler v. BCI Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Los Angeles, Inc., 279 P.3d 1188 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 12-347. Therefore, we must determine which judgment is to be used when calculating Rule 68 sanctions.”
Hall v. Schulte, 836 P.2d 989 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 2× “PREJUDGMENT INTEREST Hall takes the position that we should remand this case to the trial court in order that the judgment of $165,000 be assessed against Schulte for the full derivative liability award of the jury together with interest at the legal rate from the date of the…”
Trollope v. Koerner, 515 P.2d 340 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1973). “§ 12-341 through § 12-347 concerning when and to what extent a party has the right to an award of costs in a given action.”
Connell v. Connell, III (Ariz. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “2 See A.R.S. § 12-347 (calling for inclusion of “interest on 2 Laura could have received prejudgment interest on this portion of the award beginning on the date of her offer of judgment as a component 7 CONNELL v.”
Oliver v. Henry, 260 P.3d 314 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “§ 12-342(A) (2003) and interest on the judgment pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-347 (2003). CONCURRING: MAURICE PORTLEY, Presiding Judge and ANN A SCOTT TIMMER, Chief Judge.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.