Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 14
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-10101 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

14-10101. Short title

This chapter may be cited as the Arizona trust code.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2011–2026 · leading case: Owner-Operator Indep. Drivers Ass'n v. Pac. Fin. Ass'n, 388 P.3d 556 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Owner-Operator Indep. Drivers Ass'n v. Pac. Fin. Ass'n, 388 P.3d 556 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “4 *410 ¶ 8 The superior court dismissed the complaint on the grounds that the Agreement did not create a “trust” under the Arizona Trust Code, A.R.S. § 14-10101, et seq. (2015) (“Trust Code”).”
Wade Harvey, Ex Rel. Alexis Breanna Gladden v. Cumberland Trust & Inv. Co., 532 S.W.3d 243 (Tenn. 2017). “Code §§ 19 -3B-101 to 19-3B-1305 (2007); Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 14-10101 to 14-11102 (2012); Ark.”
State v. Glassel, 248 P.3d 217 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “§ 31-230(C) ¶ 6 Glassel argues the court incorrectly concluded that monetary gifts deposited into his spendable account can be used for restitution payments under A.R.S. § 31-230(C) despite the donor's express desire that the funds not be used for restitution.”
May v. May (Ariz. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 2× “Because the Arizona Trust Code does not define those terms, see generally A.R.S. §§ 14-10101 et seq., we interpret them according to their ordinary meaning, looking to the dictionary for guidance.”
Wade Harvey, Ex Rel. Alexis Breanna Gladden v. Cumberland Trust & Inv. Co. (Tenn. Ct. App. 2017). “Code §§ 19 -3B-101 to 19-3B-1305 (2007); Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 14-10101 to 14- 11102 (2012); Ark.”
Wade Harvey, Ex Rel. Alexis Breanna Gladden v. Cumberland Trust & Inv. Co. (Tenn. 2017). “Code §§ 19 -3B-101 to 19-3B-1305 (2007); Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. §§ 14-10101 to 14- 11102 (2012); Ark.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.