Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 14
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-10107 (2026)

Governing law

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

14-10107. Governing law

A. The meaning and effect of the terms of a trust are determined by the law of the jurisdiction designated in the terms of the trust instrument.

B. In the absence of a controlling designation in the terms of the trust, the laws of the jurisdiction where the trust was executed determine the validity of the trust, and the laws of descent and the law of the principal place of administration determine the administration of the trust.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2016–2026 · leading case: May v. May (Ariz. Ct. App. 2026).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
May v. May (Ariz. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 2× “” See A.R.S. § 14-10107(B) (providing that unless the terms of the trust otherwise provide, “the laws of the jurisdiction where the trust was executed determine the validity of the trust,” while “the laws of descent and the law of the principal place of administration determine…”
Wells Fargo v. Hoag (Ariz. Ct. App. 2016). “”) § 14-10107 (“The meaning and effect of the terms of a trust are determined by the law of the jurisdiction designated in the terms of the trust instrument.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 14-10107(B) — 1 case
May v. May (Ariz. Ct. App. 2026). “” See A.R.S. § 14-10107(B) (providing that unless the terms of the trust otherwise provide, “the laws of the jurisdiction where the trust was executed determine the validity of the trust,” while “the laws of descent and the law of the principal place of administration determine…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.