21-301. Master jury list; source lists
A. The jury commissioner shall produce a master jury list. The master jury list shall be comprised of the names, addresses, dates of birth and, if available, telephone numbers and email addresses of eligible persons who reside in the county and shall include persons on the voter registration list of the county, other persons eligible for jury service who have been licensed pursuant to title 28, chapter 8, article 4 or 5 and persons from other lists as determined by the supreme court. The master jury list shall be prepared so as to avoid duplication of the names of eligible juror candidates.
B. Not later than January 1 following each biennial general election, the county recorder shall provide the jury commissioner or jury manager with a list containing the names, addresses, dates of birth and, if available, telephone numbers and email addresses of all persons who are qualified to vote at the preceding general election. At least once every six months thereafter the county recorder shall provide the jury commissioner with the names, addresses, dates of birth and, if available, telephone numbers and email addresses of all additional persons who have registered as voters since the date of the last list.
C. On written request by a jury commissioner or jury manager, the director of the department of transportation shall furnish and periodically revise a list of the names, addresses, dates of birth and, if available, telephone numbers and email addresses of all persons in that county who are at least eighteen years of age and who have been licensed pursuant to title 28, chapter 8, article 4 or 5. Except as provided in section 21-312, a jury commissioner or jury manager may not disclose information furnished by the director of the department of transportation pursuant to this section to any person, organization or agency for any use other than the selection of jurors.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
19
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1944–2022 · leading case:
Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005).
Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005).
· cites it 2× “010 (a)(3) (Lexis 2004) Arizona 18 Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 21-301 (D) (West 2002) Arkansas 18 Ark.”
Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988).
· cites it 2× “Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 21-301 (D) (Supp.”
State v. Murray, 906 P.2d 542 (Ariz. 1995).
· cites it 2× “Improper Master List Contrary to AR.S. § 21-301(B) (Supp. 1994), the original master jury list was composed only of licensed drivers and did not include registered voters.”
State v. Little, 350 P.2d 756 (Ariz. 1960).
· cites it 4× “Defendant claims that the jury was selected from a voters’ registration list prepared approximately two and one-half years prior to trial, instead of from a list compiled in accordance with A.R.S. § 21-301. This Section provides : “A.”
State v. Miller, 658 P.2d 808 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1982).
· cites it 8× “He raises five issues for consideration: (1) whether the trial court erred in denying his motion to quash the jury panel because it was not selected in accordance with A.R.S. § 21-301; (2) whether the trial court erred in determining that statements made by the defendant to the…”
State v. Acosta, 608 P.2d 83 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1980).
· cites it 6× “The evidence further showed that prospective grand jurors are selected from voter registration lists pursuant to A.R.S. § 21-301, 1 by a computerized random selection process.”
State v. Lee, 559 P.2d 657 (Ariz. 1976).
· cites it 2× “Jurors in Arizona are selected at random from voter registration lists pursuant to A.R.S. § 21-301(A). The use of voter registration lists as the sole source of the names of potential jurors is not constitutionally invalid, absent a showing of discrimination in the compiling of…”
State v. Brierly, 509 P.2d 203 (Ariz. 1973).
· cites it 3× “The governing statute at the time was ARS § 21-301, (sub A) : § 21-301. Jury list and jury box A.”
State v. Mahoney, 475 P.2d 479 (Ariz. 1970).
· cites it 3× “While the legislature has since changed the method of selecting a jury as set forth in A.R.S. § 21-301, subsec. A, the method used in selecting jurors in the instant case does not show prejudice to the defendant.”
State v. Taylor, 508 P.2d 731 (Ariz. 1973).
· cites it 2× “EXCLUSION OF 18 TO 21 YEAR OLD JURORS. Trial in this matter was held in December of 1970 and at that time the Arizona Revised Statutes required that a person to be a registered voter must be 21 years or more of age.”
State v. Dogan, 724 P.2d 1264 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986).
· cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 21-301. Appellant contends that his right to an impartial jury was violated because only two of the 33 persons randomly selected for his venire were black.”
State ex rel. Romley v. Johnson, 993 P.2d 453 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1998).
· cites it 4× “A.R.S. § 21-301(A). The counly jury commissioner maintains the county’s master jury list, which is derived from voter registration and driver’s license lists of “eligible persons who reside in the county.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 21-301(A) — 2 cases
State v. Lee, 559 P.2d 657 (Ariz. 1976).
“Jurors in Arizona are selected at random from voter registration lists pursuant to A.R.S. § 21-301(A). The use of voter registration lists as the sole source of the names of potential jurors is not constitutionally invalid, absent a showing of discrimination in the compiling of…”
State ex rel. Romley v. Johnson, 993 P.2d 453 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1998).
“A.R.S. § 21-301(A). The counly jury commissioner maintains the county’s master jury list, which is derived from voter registration and driver’s license lists of “eligible persons who reside in the county.”
— Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 21-301(B) — 3 cases
State v. Murray, 906 P.2d 542 (Ariz. 1995).
“Improper Master List Contrary to AR.S. § 21-301(B) (Supp. 1994), the original master jury list was composed only of licensed drivers and did not include registered voters.”
State v. Miller, 658 P.2d 808 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1982).
“He raises five issues for consideration: (1) whether the trial court erred in denying his motion to quash the jury panel because it was not selected in accordance with A.R.S. § 21-301; (2) whether the trial court erred in determining that statements made by the defendant to the…”
State ex rel. Romley v. Johnson, 993 P.2d 453 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1998).
“A.R.S. § 21-301(A). The counly jury commissioner maintains the county’s master jury list, which is derived from voter registration and driver’s license lists of “eligible persons who reside in the county.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.