Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 22-243 (2026)

Judgment in replevin

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Where judgment is for the recovery of specific articles, their value shall be separately found by the verdict or decision and the judgment shall be that plaintiff recover the specific articles if they can be found, and if not, then their value as assessed with interest thereon at the legal rate from the date of the judgment.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1992–1992 · leading case: State v. Brown, 840 P.2d 280 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992).
State v. Brown, 840 P.2d 280 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 2× “, A.R.S. § 22-243. Nor is the fact that the forfeiture statutes refer in other places to the superior court and its clerk evidence of an intent to confer exclusive jurisdiction on superior court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.