Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 23
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-103 (2026)

Organization; quorum

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A majority of the commission shall constitute a quorum to transact business. When a vacancy occurs in the commission, the remaining commissioners may exercise all the powers of the commission until the vacancy is filled.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1945–2018 · leading case: Scowden v. Indus. Comm'n, 563 P.2d 336 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Scowden v. Indus. Comm'n, 563 P.2d 336 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1977). · cites it 12× “162, § 35) provides that any powers or duties prescribed by law to the Commission may by resolution be delegated by the Commission, provided that "[T]he commission shall not delegate its power or duty to ... Commute awards to a lump sum.”
Siegel v. Arizona State Liquor Bd., 807 P.2d 1136 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “” A.R.S. § 23-103 says: A majority of the commission shall constitute a quorum to transact business.”
Arizona Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. Wagner, 251 P.2d 897 (Ariz. 1952). · cites it 2× “The statute assertedly violated by this ruling is subsection 3 of Section 23-103, A.C.A.1939, which provides in part: “A husband can not be examined for or against his wife without her consent, nor a wife for or against her husband without his consent; nor can either, during the…”
Tripp v. Chubb, 208 P.2d 312 (Ariz. 1949). “Under our statutes and the decisions of this court a client who offers himself as a witness and voluntarily testifies to such communications is deemed to have waived the privilege and in effect consented to the examination of such attorney.”
Gates v. Kilcrease, 188 P.2d 247 (Ariz. 1947). “Likewise, under the statute of Privileged Communication, Code 1939, § 23-103, the patient of an osteopathic physician would be given protection identical with that of the patient of a medical physician.”
Guldin v. State of Arizona, 161 P.2d 121 (Ariz. 1945). “What did he do in regard to your clothing at that time?” The court interrupted before she could answer, and asked this leading question: “Q.”
Benites v. Indus. Comm'n, 459 P.2d 738 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1970). · cites it 2× “” A.R.S. § 23-103 provides, in part: “A majority of the commission shall constitute a quorum to transact business.”
Atkins v. Inlet Transp. & Taxi Serv., Inc., 426 P.3d 1124 (Alaska 2018). “2d 180 , 181-82 (2000) (en banc) (citing former Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-103 (C) ). In contrast, AS 23.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.