Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 23
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 23-682 (2026)

Service of documents by electronic means

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

23-682. Service of documents by electronic means

Notwithstanding section 41-1002, subsection B and section 41-1063, the appeal tribunal or appeals board, as an alternative to any other means of service permitted or required by any law, may serve or deliver any notice, decision or order or any other document by electronic means if the party being served consents in writing or on the record to service by electronic means.  Service by electronic means is deemed complete on transmission.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1964–1979 · leading case: Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Dir. of Ins., 422 P.2d 108 (Ariz. 1966).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Dir. of Ins., 422 P.2d 108 (Ariz. 1966). · cites it 2× “Employment Security § 23-682 40. Eminent Domain § 12-1127 41.”
Mountain View Pioneer Hosp. v. Emp. Sec. Comm'n, 482 P.2d 448 (Ariz. 1971). · cites it 2× “This Court has jurisdiction in this matter by virtue of A.R.S. § 23-682. This is one of two cases which are being appealed simultaneously: (1) Mountain View Pioneer Hospital v.”
Miranda v. Beaman, 391 P.2d 555 (Ariz. 1964). · cites it 2× “This appeal followed pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-682. Under a judicial review of a decision of the Commission, the matter is not heard in the Superior Court de novo.”
Barry v. Arizona Dep't of Econ. Sec., 542 P.2d 1138 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1975). · cites it 3× “” (emphasis added) A.R.S. § 23-682, however, provides as follows: § 23-682.”
Arizona Dept. of Econ. Sec. v. King, 593 P.2d 908 (Ariz. 1979). · cites it 2× “The appeal is taken pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-682. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 19(e) of the Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.”
Arizona Dep't of Econ. Sec. v. King, 593 P.2d 908 (Ariz. 1979). · cites it 2× “The appeal is taken pursuant to A.R.S. § 23-682. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 19(e) of the Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.