Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 25
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 25-1004 (2026)

Application to Indian tribes

✓ text as last checked Oct. 2026 (this copy records no edition or section history)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

25-1004. Application to Indian tribes

A. A child custody proceeding that pertains to an Indian child as defined in the Indian child welfare act (25 United States Code section 1903) is not subject to this chapter to the extent that it is governed by the Indian child welfare act.

B. A court of this state shall treat a tribe as if it were a state of the United States for the purpose of applying this article and article 2 of this chapter.

C. A child custody determination made by a tribe under factual circumstances in substantial conformity with the jurisdictional standards of this chapter must be recognized and enforced under article 3 of this chapter.  

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2009–2026 · leading case: Duwyenie v. Moran, 207 P.3d 754 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Duwyenie v. Moran, 207 P.3d 754 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 4× “” A.R.S. § 25-1004(B). 7 . Section 25-1004(C), similarly provides that: "A child custody determination made by a tribe under factual circumstances in substantial conformity with the jurisdictional standards of this chapter must be recognized and enforced under [§§ 25-1051…”
Antanelle Duwyenie v. William C. Moran, No. 2 CA-CV 2008-0101 (Ariz. Ct. App. Feb. 11, 2009). · cites it 4× “” A.R.S. § 25-1004(B). 7 Section 25-1004(C), similarly provides that: “A child custody determination made by a tribe under factual circumstances in substantial conformity with the jurisdictional standards of this chapter must be recognized and enforced under [§§ 25-1051 through…”
Anthony v. Anthony, No. 1 CA-CV 17-0384-FC (Ariz. Ct. App. June 12, 2018). · cites it 2× “” A.R.S. § 25-1004(B) (2017). ¶19 In addition to complying with A.”
Griffith v. Bennett, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0671 FC (Ariz. Ct. App. May 28, 2026). · cites it 2× “¶8 Under the UCCJEA, Arizona has jurisdiction over child custody matters when Arizona qualifies as the home state.”
Anthony v. Hon. wilkins/anthony, No. 1 CA-SA 15-0237 (Ariz. Ct. App. Sept. 24, 2015). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 25-1004. Mother therefore argues that the Navajo Nation, rather than Arizona, is E.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 25-1004(B): 4 cases
Duwyenie v. Moran, 207 P.3d 754 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009). “” A.R.S. § 25-1004(B). 7 . Section 25-1004(C), similarly provides that: "A child custody determination made by a tribe under factual circumstances in substantial conformity with the jurisdictional standards of this chapter must be recognized and enforced under [§§ 25-1051…”
Anthony v. Anthony, No. 1 CA-CV 17-0384-FC (Ariz. Ct. App. June 12, 2018). “” A.R.S. § 25-1004(B) (2017). ¶19 In addition to complying with A.”
Griffith v. Bennett, No. 1 CA-CV 25-0671 FC (Ariz. Ct. App. May 28, 2026). “¶8 Under the UCCJEA, Arizona has jurisdiction over child custody matters when Arizona qualifies as the home state.”
Antanelle Duwyenie v. William C. Moran, No. 2 CA-CV 2008-0101 (Ariz. Ct. App. Feb. 11, 2009). “” A.R.S. § 25-1004(B). 7 Section 25-1004(C), similarly provides that: “A child custody determination made by a tribe under factual circumstances in substantial conformity with the jurisdictional standards of this chapter must be recognized and enforced under [§§ 25-1051 through…”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 25-1004(C): 2 cases
Duwyenie v. Moran, 207 P.3d 754 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2009). “” A.R.S. § 25-1004(B). 7 . Section 25-1004(C), similarly provides that: "A child custody determination made by a tribe under factual circumstances in substantial conformity with the jurisdictional standards of this chapter must be recognized and enforced under [§§ 25-1051…”
Antanelle Duwyenie v. William C. Moran, No. 2 CA-CV 2008-0101 (Ariz. Ct. App. Feb. 11, 2009). “” A.R.S. § 25-1004(B). 7 Section 25-1004(C), similarly provides that: “A child custody determination made by a tribe under factual circumstances in substantial conformity with the jurisdictional standards of this chapter must be recognized and enforced under [§§ 25-1051 through…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.