Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 28
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 28-453 (2026)

Electronic transfer of information

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The department may accept electronic communication, transfer or receipt of any abstract, affidavit, application information, copy, form, order, report, record or other information prescribed in this title.

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1985–2003 · leading case: State v. Jennings, 722 P.2d 258 (Ariz. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Jennings, 722 P.2d 258 (Ariz. 1986). · cites it 4× “If the legislature had intended to have this language apply to both §§ 28-445 and 28-446, it could have simply placed it in both sections or in A.R.S. § 28-453 which covers the notice of revocation that must be given under both sections.”
State v. Gonzales, 80 P.3d 276 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “In rejecting the argument that the language should apply to both statutes, the court stated that “[i]f the legislature had intended to have this language apply to both §§ 28-445 and 28-446, it could have simply placed it in both sections or in A.R.S. § 28-453 which covers the…”
State v. Church, 854 P.2d 137 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 3× “section 28-453, which provides: Notice by the department to a person possessing a driver’s license, .”
State v. Agee, 887 P.2d 588 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “section 28-445, the statute at issue in this appeal, was amended by the addition of subsection B, which provides: “Compliance with the mailing provisions of § 28-453 constitutes notice of the revocation for purposes of prosecution under § 28-473 or 28-692.”
State v. Jennings, 722 P.2d 334 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1985). “The language added by the amendment concerned the giving of notice of suspension or revocation: “Compliance with the mailing provisions of § 28-453 constitutes notice of the suspension or revocation for the purposes of prosecution under § 28-473 or 28-692.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.