Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 28
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 28-922 (2026)

Lighted lamps required

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

At any time from sunset to sunrise and at any other time when there is not sufficient light to render clearly discernible persons and vehicles on the highway at a distance of five hundred feet ahead, a vehicle on a highway in this state shall display lighted lamps and illuminating devices as required by this article for different classes of vehicles, subject to exceptions for parked vehicles as provided in this article.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1965–2022 · leading case: Riley v. Jones, 430 P.2d 699 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1967).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Riley v. Jones, 430 P.2d 699 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1967). · cites it 2× “In her instruction, the trial judge quoted from two statutes, the one regulating the display of lighted lamps and illuminating devices (A.R.S. § 28-922), and the other regulating the yielding of the right of way to the vehicle on the right when two vehicles enter or approach an…”
Robledo v. Kopp, 409 P.2d 288 (Ariz. 1965). “§ 28 — 942—When a motor vehicle is being operated on a roadway or shoulder adjacent thereto during the times specified in § 28-922, the driver shall use a distribution of light, or composite beam, directed high enough and of sufficient intensity to reveal persons and vehicles at…”
Robledo v. Kopp, 409 P.2d 288 (Ariz. 1965). “§ 28-942 — When a motor vehicle is being operated on a roadway or shoulder adjacent thereto during the times specified in § 28-922, the driver shall use a distribution of light, or composite beam, directed high enough and of sufficient intensity to reveal persons and vehicles at…”
City of Tucson v. Gallagher, 483 P.2d 798 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1971). “Based upon the appellees’ contention that McMahon reasonably mistook the unpaved desert right of way of Golf Links Road as a road and the ditch for a dip in the road, appellant offered its instruction number 1 concerning the duty to drive on the right side of a road, A.”
LeRoy v. Phillips, 399 P.2d 669 (Ariz. 1965). “ehicle shall, consistent with the requirements of subsection A, drive at an appropriate reduced speed when approaching and crossing an intersection or railway grade crossing, when approaching and going around a curve, when approaching a hill crest, when traveling upon any narrow…”
Waterford v. Sanchez (Ariz. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “See A.R.S. § 28-922 (requiring all vehicles “on a highway” to “display lighted lamps and illuminating devices” at “any time from sunset to sunrise and at any other time when there is not sufficient light to render clearly discernible persons and vehicles on the highway at a 7…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.