Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 29
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 29-345 (2026)

Judicial dissolution

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

On application by or for a partner or assignee or any other successor in interest of a partner, the superior court may decree dissolution of a limited partnership whenever it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the business in conformity with the partnership agreement.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2012–2020 · leading case: TP Racing, L.L.L.P. v. Simms, 307 P.3d 56 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
TP Racing, L.L.L.P. v. Simms, 307 P.3d 56 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 9× “(A.R.S. § 29-345) 429. The allegations set forth in the preceding paragraphs are incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.”
Sun Valley Ranch 308 Ltd. P'ship v. Robson, 294 P.3d 125 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 4× “Dissolution and Accounting ¶ 27 Plaintiffs allege that defendants’ breaches of contract and fiduciary duties have rendered it impossible “to carry on the Partnership without denying Englewood its benefits as a limited partner.”
Majerle v. Zimmerman (Ariz. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 29-345. B. A.R.S. § 12-341.01(A) Applies to Majerle’s Claims Against the Trusts.”
Caliente v. Wildflower (Ariz. Ct. App. 2020). “It only identifies the venue where Caliente must bring its claim. The superior court’s conclusion also is contrary to language in the PPA.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.