Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 3
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 3-101 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In this title, unless the context otherwise requires:

1. "Department" means the Arizona department of agriculture.

2. "Director" means the director of the department.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1984–2008 · leading case: City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., 181 P.3d 219 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., 181 P.3d 219 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “The City contends the billboards at issue here are “illegal signs” under Tucson Code § 3-101, and § 3-102(A) therefore requires that they be removed or brought into compliance with the current code.”
Roberts v. Robert, 158 P.3d 899 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “§ 14-3101 and § 14 — 3901 are virtually identical to § 3-101 and § 3-901, respectively, of the Uniform Probate Code.”
Consol. Roofing & Supply Co. v. Grimm, 682 P.2d 457 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1984). “§ 3-101). It is applicable to persons who are parties to negotiable instruments.”
City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. (Ariz. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 2× “The City contends the billboards at issue here are “illegal signs” under Tucson Code § 3-101, and § 3-102(A) therefore requires that they be removed or brought into compliance with the current code.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.