Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 38
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 38-505 (2026)

Additional income prohibited for services

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. No public officer or employee may receive or agree to receive directly or indirectly compensation other than as provided by law for any service rendered or to be rendered by him personally in any case, proceeding, application, or other matter which is pending before the public agency of which he is a public officer or employee.

B. This section shall not be construed to prohibit the performance of ministerial functions including, but not limited to, the filing, or amendment of tax returns, applications for permits and licenses, incorporation papers, and other documents.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2001–2007 · leading case: State v. Ross, 151 P.3d 1261 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Ross, 151 P.3d 1261 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 2× “§ 38-504(B) (prohibiting disclosure of confidential information); A.R.S. § 38-505(A) (2001) (barring an officer from receiving additional income "for any service rendered .”
Steiger v. Woods, 32 P.3d 19 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001). · cites it 3× “As a matter of law, appellants did not violate A.R.S. § 38-505. ¶49 Steiger also argues that appellants received a salary or emolument in violation of A.”
Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 38-505(A): 2 cases
State v. Ross, 151 P.3d 1261 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2007). “§ 38-504(B) (prohibiting disclosure of confidential information); A.R.S. § 38-505(A) (2001) (barring an officer from receiving additional income "for any service rendered .”
Steiger v. Woods, 32 P.3d 19 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2001). “As a matter of law, appellants did not violate A.R.S. § 38-505. ¶49 Steiger also argues that appellants received a salary or emolument in violation of A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.