Ariz. Rev. Stat. » Title 47
Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 47-2102 (2026)

Scope; certain security and other transactions excluded from this chapter

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Unless the context otherwise requires, this chapter applies to transactions in goods; it does not apply to any transaction which although in the form of an unconditional contract to sell or present sale is intended to operate only as a security transaction nor does this chapter impair or repeal any statute regulating sales to consumers, farmers or other specified classes of buyers.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1986–2026 · leading case: Pac. Am. Leasing Corp. v. S.P.E. Bldg. Sys., Inc., 730 P.2d 273 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Pac. Am. Leasing Corp. v. S.P.E. Bldg. Sys., Inc., 730 P.2d 273 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 6× “See A.R.S. § 47-2102. It also argues that the specific sections of Article 2 dealing with warranty, unconscionability and revocation of acceptance are inapplicable or unavailable to Building Systems in this case.”
Two Bros. Distrib. Inc. v. Valero Mktg. & Supply Co., 270 F. Supp. 3d 1112 (D. Ariz. 2017). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 47-2102. Arizona’s version of U.”
Hillery v. Georgie Boy Mfg., Inc., 341 F. Supp. 2d 1112 (D. Ariz. 2004). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 47-2102. “Goods” for purposes of Chapter 2 of the *1115 U.”
Offen Petroleum LLC v. L&J Express, LLC, et al. (D. Ariz. 2026). · cites it 2× “70) at 7 (citing A.R.S. §§ 47-2102, 47-2105(A), 47-2107(A)); (Doc.”
Robert Reish v. Phoenix Heliparts, Inc. (9th Cir. 2021). “See Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 47-2102 (noting that Arizona UCC “applies to transactions in goods”); see also Sidi Spaces, 2020 WL 6799262 , at *9.”
Sec. Pac. Bank Arizona v. Cory Investments, Inc., 885 P.2d 195 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “A.R.S. § 47-2102. A security interest is defined in the UCC as “an interest in personal property .”
Hutcherson v. Sears Roebuck & Co. (Ill. App. Ct. 2003). “” Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 47-2102 (West 1997).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.