Arizona Revised Statutes

Ariz. Rev. Stat. § 48-247 (2026)

Exemption from antitrust statutes

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section AZ-LEGazleg.gov (official) JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The provisions of title 44, chapter 10, article 1, shall not apply to any conduct or activity of a district organized pursuant to this title, which conduct or activity is approved by a statute of this state or of the United States or by the corporation commission or an administrative agency of this state or of the United States having jurisdiction of the subject matter.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2020–2020 · leading case: Ellis v. Salt River Proj. Agric. Improvement & Power Dist. (D. Ariz. 2020).
Ellis v. Salt River Proj. Agric. Improvement & Power Dist. (D. Ariz. 2020). · cites it 2× “) As alleged, neither can proceed because the FAC inadequately alleges antitrust 25 14 As a result, the Court need not analyze whether (1) A.R.S. 48-247 bars Plaintiffs’ state antitrust claims; or (2) A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.