green
Positive treatment
1.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Young v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance
See Connecticut National Bank v. Rytman, 241 Conn. 24, 34 , 694 A.2d 1246 (1997).” Milford v. Andresakis, 52 Conn. App. 454 , 455 n.l, 726 A.2d 1170 , cert. denied, 248 Conn. 922 , 733 A.2d 845 (1999).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barry v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF NEW BRITAIN
See Upjohn Co. v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 224 Conn. 82,93 , 616 A.2d 786 (1992); see also Milford v. Andresakis, 52 Conn. App. 454,458 n.7, 726 A.2d 1170 , cert. denied, 248 Conn. 922 , 733 A.2d 845 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MARINE MIDLAND BANK
v.
PATRICK M. AHERN
v.
PATRICK M. AHERN
SC 16103.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 6, 1999.
Charles D. Ray, in support of the petition., Thomas G. Wolff, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 51 Conn. App. 790 (AC 18041), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the defendants were not aggrieved by a trial court order prohibiting a nonparty general partnership from disposing of any of its funds, where the general partners of the subject partnership are two coiporations, where the defendants are the sole owners of one of those corporations, and where the order was requested to prevent the defendants from disbursing funds from the partnership to themselves?”Charles D. Ray, in support of the petition. Thomas G. Wolff, in opposition. Decided May 6, 1999