green
Positive treatment
7.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Clue v. Commissioner of Correction
See In re Annessa J., supra, 676. 8 This court also has recognized that ‘‘[a] court may correct a clerical error at any time, even after the expiration of the four month period.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Cusano v. Burgundy Chevrolet, Inc., 55 Conn. App. 655, 659 , 740 A.2d 447 (1999), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 942 , 747 A.2d 519 (2000); see also Ryan v. Cassella, 180 Conn. App. 461, 477 , 184 A.3d 311 (2018) (holding that ‘‘§ 52-212a did not preclude the court from granting [a] motion to correct a technical defect in a party’s name’’ more than four months after ent…
discussed
Cited "see"
Sanzo v. Sanzo
Accordingly, the issue of whether the court abused its discretion in ordering a foreclosure by sale in the underlying judgment is not properly before us; see Cusano v. Burgundy Chevrolet, Inc., 55 Conn. App. 655 , 658 n.4, 740 A.2d 447 (1999), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 942 , 747 A.2d 519 (2000); Madison Hills Ltd.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Martinez
(2×)
See State v. Miller, 55 Conn.App. 298, 301 , 739 A.2d 1264 (1999) ("[a] defendant is permitted to present inconsistent defenses to a jury"), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 923 , 747 A.2d 519 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Aetna Life Insurance v. City of Middletown
See Cusano v. Burgundy Chevrolet, Inc., 55 Conn. App. 655, 659-60 , 740 A.2d 447 (1999) (General Statutes § 52-212a, Practice Book § 17-4 do not bar court from opening judgment at any time to correct clerical error), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 942 , 747 A.2d 519 (2000); see also Goldreyer v. Cronan, 76 Conn. 113, 115-16 , 55 A. 594 (1903) (“[o]ver its recorded judgments the court may exercise . . . the power to correct and amend the record so that it shall truly show what the judicial action in fact was”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Singleton
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Miller, 55 Conn.App. 298, 300-301 , 739 A.2d 1264 (1999) (defendant need not admit to having acted intentionally to assert claim of self-defense), cert. denied, 252 Conn. 923 , 747 A.2d 519 (2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
ALBERT GEBEAU
v.
ALBERT GEBEAU
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Feb 2, 2000.
David B. Rozwaski, special public defender, in support of the petition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 55 Conn. App. 795 (AC 17412), is denied.