green
Positive treatment
3.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Osuch
See Honan v. Dimyan, 63 Conn. App. 702 , 706 n.10, 778 A.2d 989 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 942 , 786 A.2d 430 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
Embalmers' Supply Co. v. Giannitti
See Honan v. Dimyan, 63 Conn. App. 702 , 778 A.2d 989 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 942 , 786 A.2d 430 (2001); State v. Gracewski, 61 Conn. App. 726, 734 , 767 A.2d 173 (2001); State v. Harris, 28 Conn. App. 474, 476-77 , 612 A.2d 123 , cert. denied, 223 Conn. 926 , 614 A.2d 828 (1992); State v. Anthony, 24 Conn. App. 195, 210 , 588 A.2d 214 , cert. dismissed, 218 Conn. 911 , 591 A.2d 813 , cert. denied, 502 U.S. 913 , 112 S. Ct. 312 , 116 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Shapero v. Mercede
Our Supreme Court granted the plaintiffs petition for certification to appeal; see Shapero v. Mercede, 258 Conn. 944 , 786 A.2d 430 (2001); reversed our decision; see footnote 2; and remanded the case to this court “for consideration of the plaintiffs claim on cross appeal regarding the propriety of the $5000 [credit].” Shapero v. Mercede, supra, 262 Conn. 11 .
cited
Cited "see"
TDS Painting & Restoration, Inc. v. Copper Beech Farm, Inc.
See Honan v. Dimyan, 63 Conn. App. 702 , 778 A.2d 989 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 942 , 786 A.2d 430 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
LaMacchia v. Chilinsky
“Res judicata or claim preclusion prevents a litigant from reasserting a claim that has already been decided on the merits.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Virgo v. Lyons, 209 Conn. 497, 501 , 551 A.2d 1243 (1988); see also Honan v. Dimyan, 63 Conn. App. 702, 708 , 778 A.2d 989 (res judicata may operate to preclude claim decided in previous proceeding within same case), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 942 , 786 A.2d 430 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
WILLIAM H. HONAN
v.
JOSEPH DIMYAN
v.
JOSEPH DIMYAN
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 27, 2001.
Nancy Burton, in support of the petition.
Published
The plaintiffs’ amended petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 702 (AC 20340), is denied.
No action will be taken on the original petition for certification.