green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Burke v. Mesniaeff
See State v. Koslik , 80 Conn. App. 746 , 756, 837 A.2d 813 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 908 , 845 A.2d 413 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burke v. Mesniaeff
See State v. Koslik, 80 Conn. App. 746, 756 , 837 A.2d 813 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 908 , 845 A.2d 413 (2004). 16 Plainly, there was sufficient evidence in the form of testimony for the jury to have concluded that the defendant acted in defense of others.
cited
Cited "see"
King v. Commissioner of Correction
See Toccaline v. Commissioner of Correction, 80 Conn. App. 792, 817 , 837 A.2d 849 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 907 , 845 A.2d 413 , cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. TOSHIO KO LOKTING
See State v. Green, 81 Conn. App. 152, 157-58 , 838 A.2d 1030 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 909 , 845 A.2d 413 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Koslik v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Koslik, 80 Conn. App. 746, 747-49 , 837 A.2d 813 , cert, denied, 268 Conn. 908 , 845 A.2d 413 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Mish
See State v. Green, 81 Conn. App. 152 , 838 A.2d 1030 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 909 , 845 A.2d 413 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Skakel v. Commissioner of Correction
See, e.g., Toccaline v. Com- missioner of Correction, 80 Conn. App. 792, 817 , 837 A.2d 849 (counsel’s performance was not deficient as result of his failure to investigate possible witness when client did not mention witness to counsel), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 907 , 845 A.2d 413 , cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Skakel v. Comm'r of Corr.
See, e.g., Toccaline v. Commissioner of Correction , 80 Conn.App. 792 , 817, 837 A.2d 849 (counsel's performance was not deficient as result of his failure to investigate possible witness when client did not mention witness to counsel), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 907 , 845 A.2d 413 , cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Commissioner of Correction
See, e.g., Toccaline v. Commissioner of Correction, 80 Conn. App. 792, 815 , 837 A.2d 849 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 907 , 845 A.2d 413 , cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ruiz v. Warden
“When [apetitioner] challenges a conviction, the question [as to prejudice] is whether there is a reasonable probability that, absent the [attorney’s] errors, the factfinder would have had a reasonable doubt respecting guilt.” (Emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) Thergood v. Commissioner of Correction, supra, 716; see also Toccaline v. Commissioner of Correction, 80 Conn. App. 792, 813-14 , 837 A.2d 849 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 907 , 845 A.2d 413 , cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Beverly v. Commissioner of Correction
See, e.g., Toccaline v. Commissioner of Correction, 80 Conn. App. 792, 802 , 837 A.2d 849 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 907 , 845 A.2d 413 , cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Browne
See, e.g., State v. Koslik, 80 Conn. App. 746, 756 , 837 A.2d 813 , cert. denied, 268 Conn. 908 , 845 A.2d 413 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
LENNARD TOCCALINE
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
v.
COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 12, 2004.
Conrad Ost Seifert, special public defender, and Hope C. Seeley, in support of the petition., Marjorie Allen Dauster, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Borden.
Published
The petitioner Lennard Toccaline’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 80 Conn. App. 792 (AC 23544), is denied.
BORDEN, J.,did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.