Town of Trumbull v. Palmer, 10 A.3d 526 (Conn. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Town of Trumbull v. Palmer, 10 A.3d 526 (Conn. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
42 citation events (42 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Simmons v. Weiss (connappct, 2017-09-05)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Simmons v. Weiss (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See Trumbull v. Palmer , 123 Conn.App. 244 , 257, 1 A.3d 1121 (burden of proof in motion to open is on moving party), cert. denied, 299 Conn. 907 , 10 A.3d 526 (2010).
discussed Cited "see" Trumbull v. Palmer (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
Following this initial judgment, the defendant unsuccessfully appealed to this court; see Trumbull v. Palmer, 104 Conn. App. 498 , 934 A.2d 323 (2007), cert. denied, 286 Conn. 905 , 944 A.2d 981 (2008); and, after the judgment was affirmed and a new sale date was set by the trial court, the defendant again appealed; see Trumbull v. Palmer, 123 Conn. App. 244 , 1 A.3d 1121 , cert. denied, 299 Conn. 907 , 10 A.3d 526 (2010); further delaying implementation of the terms of the judgment.
discussed Cited "see" In Re Jeffrey M. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Trumbull v. Palmer, 123 Conn. App. 244, 251-52 , 1 A.3d 1121 , cert. denied, 299 Conn. 907 , 10 A.3d 526 (2010). 3 Although the parties briefed the issues in the reverse order, we believe that it is necessary to address whether the department had a right to intervene in this matter before addressing whether the court’s order of commitment and placement was improper. 4 “It is well established that this court can take judicial notice of facts contained in the files of the Superior Court.
discussed Cited "see" KORES v. Calo (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
Nevertheless, because a question of subject matter jurisdiction must be decided once raised; see Trumbull v. Palmer, 123 Conn. App. 244, 250 , 1 A.3d 1121 , cert. denied, 299 Conn. 907 , 10 A.3d 526 (2010); we will review the jurisdictional claim only insofar as the court’s subject matter jurisdiction is concerned.
examined Cited "see, e.g." Hallock v. Hallock (4×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2024 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See Kammili v. Kammili, 197 Conn. App. 656, 661 , 232 A.3d 102 , cert. denied, 335 Conn. 947 , 238 A.3d 18 (2020). 7 To the extent that the defendant now suggests that the court’s response to her motion for articulation was incomplete or nonresponsive, we note that she failed to request further articulation or to file a motion for review with this court pursuant to Practice Book § 66-7. ‘‘[W]here a party is dissatis- fied with the trial court’s response to a motion for articulation, he may, and indeed under appropriate circumstances he must, seek immediate appeal . . . to this court v…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
TOWN OF TRUMBULL
v.
Linda A. PALMER, Executrix (Estate of Michael A. Knopick), et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 10, 2010.
10 A.3d 526
Published

Linda A. Palmer, pro se, in support of the petition.

The proposed intervenor Linda A. Palmer's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 123 Conn.App. 244, 1 A.3d 1121 (2010), is denied.