green
Positive treatment
2.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Sorabella
See General Statutes § 53a-71 (a) (1). “[T]he only intent required for a violation of § 53a-71 is a general intent to perform the acts that constitute the offense.” State v. Pierson, 201 Conn. 211, 216 , 514 A.2d 724 (1986); accord State v. Plude, 30 Conn. App. 527, 534-35 , 621 A.2d 1342 , cert. denied, 225 Conn. 923 , 625 A.2d 824 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Jason B.
See State v. Plude, 30 Conn. App. 527, 535 , 621 A.2d 1342 , cert. denied, 225 Conn. 923 , 625 A.2d 824 (1993); State v. Tirado, 21 Conn. App. 449, 457-58 , 574 A.2d 252 (1990); In re John C., supra, 20 Conn. App. 697 -99.
cited
Cited "see"
Laughran v. Cottman Transmission, No. 377511 (Jun. 9, 1997)
See Metro Bulletins Corp. v. Soboleski , 30 Conn. App. 493 , 499 , 620 A.2d 1314 , cert. granted , 225 Conn. 923 , 625 A.2d 423 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Spencer
Ed. 2d 316 (1999); see also State v. Plude, 30 Conn. App. 527 , 621 A.2d 1342 (consensual sexual intercourse between high *185 school teacher and thirteen year old student violated § 53-21), cert. denied, 225 Conn. 923 , 625 A.2d 824 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jason B.
As the Appellate Court noted, as a result of several Appellate Court decisions construing § 53-21, “there existed a significant judicial gloss with respect to § 53-21, of which the defendant must be presumed to have been aware, to the effect that the act of having sexual intercourse with a child under sixteen years of age was a violation of the statute, regardless of whether there was consent by the child.” State v. Jason B., supra, 47 Conn. App. 85 ; see, e.g., State v. Plude, 30 Conn. App. 527, 530 , 621 A.2d 1342 , cert. denied, 225 Conn. 923 , 625 A.2d 824 (1993) (vaginal intercourse…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Anna Lee
v.
Anna Lee
SC 14749.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Apr 22, 1993.
John A. East III, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The state of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 30 Conn. App. 470 (AC 10905), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Whether the Appellate Court correctly held that the trial court improperly precluded inquiry into the potential bias of the state’s expert witness?”