Emerick v. Kuhn, 738 A.2d 653 (Conn. 1999). · Go Syfert
Search
Emerick v. Kuhn, 738 A.2d 653 (Conn. 1999). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
55 citation events (41 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Johnson v. Commissioner of Correction (conn, 2008-07-22)
Treatment trajectory · 1999 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1999 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Johnson v. Commissioner of Correction (2×)
Conn. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Johnson, 53 Conn. App. 476, 477 , 733 A.2d 852 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 929 , 733 A.2d 849 (1999).
cited Cited "see" Abb Automation v. Zaharna, No. Cv01 0186734 S (Jul. 15, 2002)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Practice Book § 10-1 ." Emerick v. Kuhn , 52 Conn. App. 724 , 749 , n. 18, 737 A.2d 456 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 929 , 738 A.2d 653 , cert. denied sub nom.
discussed Cited "see" Doiron v. Foote, No. 557860 (Mar. 6, 2002)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Practice Book § 10-1 ." Emerick v. Kuhn , 52 Conn. App. 724 , 749 n. 18, 737 A.2d 456 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 929 , 738 A.2d 653 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1005 , 120 S.Ct. 500 , 145 L.Ed.2d 386 (1999).
discussed Cited "see" Hendriks Associates v. Old Lyme Marina, Inc., No. 546496 (Apr. 26, 2001)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Practice Book § 10-1 ." Emerick v. Kuhn, 52 Conn. App. 724 , 749 n. 18, 737 A.2d 456 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 929 , 738 A.2d 653 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1005 , 120 S.Ct. 500 , 145 L.Ed.2d 386 (1999).
cited Cited "see" Midwest Financial v. Thames Mews, No. 552852 (Mar. 1, 2001)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Practice Book § 10-1 ." Emerick v. Kuhn , 52 Conn. App. 724 , 749 n. 18, cert. denied, 249 Conn. 929 , cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1005 , 120 S.Ct. 500 , 145 L.Ed.2d 386 (1999).
discussed Cited "see" Steiman v. Pitkoff, No. Cv00 037 36 83 (Nov. 8, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See Emerick v. Kuhn, 52 Conn. App. 724 , 744 , 737 A.2d 456 , cert. denied, 249 Conn. 929 , 738 A.2d 653 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 120 S.Ct. 500 , 145 L.Ed.2d 386 (1999) (stating that "[a]nalysis, rather than mere abstract assertion, is required in order to avoid abandoning an issue by failure to brief the issue properly. . . .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Lund v. Milford Hospital, Inc.
Conn. · 2017 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Alexander v. Commissioner of Administrative Ser- vices, 86 Conn. App. 677, 683 , 862 A.2d 851 (2004) (‘‘new allegations [in amended complaint] that transformed [the] previous, generic equal protec- tion claim into a colorable claim of selective enforcement . . . differ materi- ally from the equal protection allegation contained in [the] original complaint’’), Emerick v. Kuhn, 52 Conn. App. 724, 734 , 737 A.2d 456 (adding statutory and constitutional references, even if inapposite, ‘‘may be read as attempting to address the legal insufficiency specifically identified by the …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Justin LUND v. MILFORD HOSPITAL, INC.
Conn. · 2017 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Alexander v. Commissioner of Administrative Services , 86 Conn.App. 677 , 683, 862 A.2d 851 (2004) ("new allegations [in amended complaint] that transformed [the] previous, generic equal protection claim into a colorable claim of selective enforcement ... differ materially from the equal protection allegation contained in [the] original complaint"), Emerick v. Kuhn , 52 Conn.App. 724 , 734, 737 A.2d 456 (adding statutory and constitutional references, even if inapposite, "may be read as attempting to address the legal insufficiency specifically identified by the trial court ... making …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Thibodeau v. Design Group One Architects, LLC
Conn. App. Ct. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id., 80; see also Emerick v. Kuhn, 52 Conn. App. 724, 741 , 737 A.2d 456 (“issue before us is whether the plaintiffs dismissal violated an important public policy derived from [several state statutes, a federal regulation or an executive order]” [emphasis added]), cert. denied, 249 Conn. 929 , 738 A.2d 653 , cert. denied sub nom.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Faust v. Connecticut Junior Republic, No. Cv99 033 66 98 S (Sep. 29, 2000)
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
"A motion to strike, like a demurrer, is to be tested by the allegations of the pleading demurred to, which cannot be enlarged by the assumption of any fact not therein alleged." (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Alarm Applications Co. v. Simsbury Volunteer Fire Co. , supra, 549-50; see also Emerick v. Kuhn , 52 Conn. App. 724 , 739 , cert. denied 249 Conn. 929 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 120 S.Ct. 500 , 145 L.Ed.2d 386 (1999).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
ROGER EMERICK
v.
ROBERT KUHN
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 7, 1999.
738 A.2d 653
Roger Emerick, pro se, in support of the petition.
Norcott.
Published

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 724 (AC 16412), is denied.

Roger Emerick, pro se, in support of the petition. Decided July 7, 1999 NORCOTT, J.,

did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.