Marshall v. Hartford Hosp., 786 A.2d 425 (Conn. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Marshall v. Hartford Hosp., 786 A.2d 425 (Conn. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2006 · …the primary test to determine the existence of a unity of interest is whether there are separate issues of liability as to the two entities or persons. if the liability bases differ, there is no unity of interest. ⚠ not in text
54 citation events (54 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Carrano v. Yale-New Haven Hospital (conn, 2006-08-22)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Carrano v. Yale-New Haven Hospital (4×)
Conn. · 2006 · quote attribution · 4 verbatim quotes · confidence low
the primary test to determine the existence of a unity of interest is whether there are separate issues of liability as to the two entities or persons. if the liability bases differ, there is no unity of interest.
cited Cited "see" Desimini v. Bristol Hospital, Inc.
Conn. Super. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Musorofiti v. Vlcek, 65 Conn. App. 365, 375-76 , 783 A.2d 36 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 938 , 786 A.2d 426 (2001).
cited Cited "see" Cousins v. Nelson
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Musorofiti v. Vleck, 65 Conn. App. 365, 385-87 , 783 A.2d 36 , cert, denied, 258 Conn. 938 , 786 A.2d 426 (2001).
examined Cited "see" Carrano v. Yale-New Haven Hospital (4×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Marshall v. Hartford Hospital, 65 Conn. App. 738, 744 , 783 A.2d 1085 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 938 , 786 A.2d 425 (2001).
discussed Cited "see" Friedman v. Meriden Orthopaedic Group, P.C. (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Marshall v. Hartford Hospital, 65 Conn. App. 738, 758 , 783 A.2d 1085 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 938 , 786 A.2d 425 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
KAILA MARSHALL
v.
HARTFORD HOSPITAL
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 7, 2001.
786 A.2d 425
William J. Sweeney, Jr., in support of the petition., Donna R. Zito, in opposition.
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 59%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Connecticut (4)

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 65 Conn. App. 738 (AC 20345), is denied.