green
Positive treatment
3.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Solek v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Solek, 66 Conn. App. 72, 91 , 783 A.2d 1123 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 941 , 786 A.2d 428 (2001).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Burroughs
See State v. Vasquez, 66 Conn. App. 118 , 126 n.8, 783 A.2d 1183 , cert. denied, 258 Conn. 941 , 786 A.2d 428 (2001). 5 Predicting future conduct of an alleged criminal is one way by which the police can test an anonymous informant’s knowledge and credibility.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Padua
See State v. Vasquez, 66 Conn. App. 118, 126-27 , 783 A.2d 1183 (conviction and sentence for conspiracy to sell narcotics and conspiracy to sell narcotics within 1500 feet of school violate double jeopardy clause), cert. denied, 258 Conn. 941 , 786 A.2d 428 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
TIMOTHY J. SOLEK
v.
TIMOTHY J. SOLEK
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 14, 2001.
Lisa J. Steele, special public defender, in support of the petition., Susann E. Gill, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 66 Conn. App. 72 (AC 20828), is denied.