green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Campbell
See State v. Westberry , 68 Conn. App. 622 , 792 A.2d 154 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 923 , 797 A.2d 519 (2002). *950 Finally, although the record reflects that Westberry filed a habeas petition, nothing in the record confirms whether the Hartford public defender's office represented Westberry in that habeas action.
discussed
Cited "see"
Thiersaint v. Commissioner of Correction
See State v. Irala, 68 Conn. App. 499, 520 , 792 A.2d 109 (concluding that ‘‘[t]he impact of a plea’s immi- gration consequences on a defendant, while potentially great, is not of constitutional magnitude and ‘cannot transform this collateral consequence into a direct con- sequence of the plea,’ ’’ quoting State v. Malcolm, supra, 663 n.12), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 923 , 797 A.2d 519 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 887 , 123 S. Ct. 132 , 154 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Heyliger
See State v. Irala, 68 Conn. App. 499, 512 , 792 A.2d 109 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 923 , 797 A.2d 519 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 887 , 123 S. Ct. 132 , 154 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Kelly
See State v. Senquiz, 68 Conn. App. 571, 579 , 793 A.2d 1095 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 923 , 797 A.2d 519 (2002). *423 II The defendant’s next claim is that the court improperly admitted constancy of accusation testimony from G and Rickevicius.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Groppi
See State v. Irala, 68 Conn. App. 499, 507 , 792 A.2d 109 (“[a]t the appellate level, a ‘determination as to whether a plea has been knowingly and voluntarily entered entails an examination of all of the relevant circumstances’ ”), cert. denied, 260 Conn. 923 , 797 A.2d 519 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 887 , 123 S. Ct. 132 , 154 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Arpi
See State v. Irala, 68 Conn. App. 499, 520 , 792 A.2d 109 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 923 , 797 A.2d 519 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 887 , 123 S. Ct. 132 , 154 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lopez
See State v. Gray, 63 Conn. App. 151, 161 , 772 A.2d 747 , cert. denied, 256 Conn. 934 , 776 A.2d 1151 (2001); see also State v. Irala, 68 Conn. App. 499, 525 , 792 A.2d 109 , cert. denied, 260 Conn. 923 , 797 A.2d 519 , cert. denied, 537 U.S. 887 , 123 S. Ct. 132 , 154 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
FANNY IRALA
v.
FANNY IRALA
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
May 8, 2002.
James A. Wade said Jeffrey C. Kestenband, in support of the petition., Susan C. Marks, supervisory assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 68 Conn. App. 499 (AC 19874), is denied.