Boyles v. Preston, 802 A.2d 853 (Conn. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Boyles v. Preston, 802 A.2d 853 (Conn. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (20 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Bloch v. Ullman (connappct, 2016-07-19)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Bloch v. Ullman
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
Our practice does not favor the termination of proceedings without a determination of the merits of the controversy where that can be brought about with due regard to necessary rules of procedure." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., at 254, 137 A.3d 748 ; see also Boyles v. Preston, 68 Conn.App. 596 , 603, 792 A.2d 878 , cert. denied, 261 Conn. 901 , 802 A.2d 853 (2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DEANNA BOYLES
v.
RICHARD PRESTON
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jul 2, 2002.
802 A.2d 853
Richard Preston, pro se, in support of the petition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 68 Conn. App. 596 (AC 20353), is denied.

SULLIVAN, C. J., and PALMER and ZARELLA, Js., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.