green
Positive treatment
16.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Snell v. Norwalk Yellow Cab, Inc.
(2×)
The language used in the model jury instructions, although instructive in consid- ering the adequacy of a jury instruction; see State v. Sanchez, 84 Conn. App. 583 , 592 n.10, 854 A.2d 778 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 929 , 859 A.2d 585 (2004); is not binding on this court.’’ (Emphasis omitted.) Snell v. Norwalk Yellow Cab, Inc., supra, 172 Conn. App. 66–67.
examined
Cited "see"
Snell v. Norwalk Yellow Cab, Inc.
(4×)
The language used in the model jury instructions, although instructive in consid- ering the adequacy of a jury instruction; see State v. Sanchez, 84 Conn. App. 583 , 592 n.10, 854 A.2d 778 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 929 , 859 A.2d 585 (2004); is not binding on this court.’’ (Emphasis omitted.) Snell v. Norwalk Yellow Cab, Inc., supra, 172 Conn. App. 66–67.
discussed
Cited "see"
Snell v. Norwalk Yellow Cab, Inc.
(2×)
The language used in the model jury instructions, although instructive in considering the adequacy of a jury instruction; see State v. Sanchez , 84 Conn.App. 583 , 592 n.10, 854 A.2d 778 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 929 , 859 A.2d 585 (2004) ; is not binding on this court.
discussed
Cited "see"
Little v. Commissioner of Correction
See Talton v. Commissioner of Correction, 84 Conn. App. 608, 609 , 854 A.2d 764 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 930 , 859 A.2d 585 (2004). *523 To prevail in this appeal, the petitioner must, as a threshold matter, demonstrate “that the issues are debatable among jurists of reason; that a court could resolve the issues [in a different maimer]; or that the questions are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.” (Emphasis omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Simms v. Warden, 230 Conn. 608, 616 , 646 A.2d 126 (1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Boyd v. Lantz
See Boyd v. Comm'r of Corr., 84 Conn.App. 22 , 851 A.2d 1209 (2004), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 929 , 859 A.2d 583 (2004). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ortiz
(2×)
See State v. Sanchez, 84 Conn. App. 583 , 586 n.4, 854 A.2d 778 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 929 , 859 A.2d 585 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James v. Commissioner of Correction
Id., at 7 ; see also Boyd v. Commissioner of Correction , 84 Conn.App. 22 , 851 A.2d 1209 (2004), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 929 , 859 A.2d 583 (2004) ; Boyd v. Warden , Superior Court, Judicial District of Tolland, Docket No. CV-00-0003130-S (November 15, 2002) ( 33 Conn. L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Shenkman
(2×)
As our Supreme Court has noted, ‘‘[w]hile not dispositive of the adequacy of the jury instruction, an instruction’s uniformity with the model instructions is a relevant and persuasive factor in our analysis.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Ebron, 292 Conn. 656 , 688 n.27, 975 A.2d 17 (2009), overruled in part on other grounds by State v. Kitchens, 299 Conn. 447 , 472–73, 10 A.3d 942 (2011); see also State v. San- chez, 84 Conn. App. 583 , 592 n.10, 854 A.2d 778 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 929 , 859 A.2d 585 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Edwin SANCHEZ.
v.
Edwin SANCHEZ.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Oct 6, 2004.
Published
Kent Drager, senior assistant public defender, in support of the petition.
Mitchell S. Brody, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 84 Conn.App. 583, 854 A.2d 778 (2004), is denied.