State v. Goodson, 861 A.2d 515 (Conn. 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Goodson, 861 A.2d 515 (Conn. 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events (34 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Davis (connappct, 2015-10-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Davis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Gordon, 84 Conn. App. 519, 534 , 854 A.2d 74 , cert. denied, 271 Conn. 941 , 861 A.2d 516 (2004); see also State v. Gallichio, 71 Conn. App. 179, 190 , 800 A.2d 1261 (2002) (evidence of identical names alone was insufficient to prove defendant was person previously convicted).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Bereis
Conn. App. Ct. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Gordon, 84 Conn. App. 519, 526 , 854 A.2d 74 (noting that probative force of evidence not diminished by fact that evidence is circumstantial and that “[i]t is not one fact, but the cumulative impact of a multitude of facts which establishes guilt in a case involving substantial circumstantial evidence” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 941 , 861 A.2d 516 (2004).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Haight
Conn. · 2006 · signal: see also · confidence low
It is well settled that “operating” encompasses a broader range of conduct than does “driving.” See State v. Swift, supra, 125 Conn. 402 -403 (statute “refers to persons who shall operate a motor vehicle, and is not confined to persons who shall drive a motor vehicle”); see also State v. Gordon, 84 Conn. App. 519, 527 , 854 A.2d 74 (“[t]he definition of ‘operation’ does not require [a] defendant to drive the car”), cert. denied, 271 Conn. 941 , 861 A.2d 516 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
v.
ALAN GOODSON
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 4, 2004.
861 A.2d 515
Alice Osedach-Powers, assistant public defender, in support of the petition., Nancy L. Chupak, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 84 Conn. App. 786 (AC 24196), is denied.