green
Positive treatment
9.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Nelson v. Preleski
(2×)
See State v. Nelson, 118 Conn.App. 831 , 853–54, 862, 986 A.2d 311 , cert. denied, 295 Conn. 911 , 989 A.2d 1074 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bumgarner-Ramos
(2×)
See *752 State v. Nelson , 118 Conn. App. 831 , 855, 986 A.2d 311 , cert. denied, 295 Conn. 911 , 989 A.2d 1074 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nelson v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See State v. Nelson , 118 Conn.App. 831 , 853-54, 862, 986 A.2d 311 , cert. denied, 295 Conn. 911 , 989 A.2d 1074 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Godbolt
(2×)
See State v. Nelson, 118 Conn. App. 831 , 841 n.3, 986 A.2d 311 (rejecting argument that defendant’s affirmative representation that he was ready to proceed, made after court indicated that it would not grant requested continuance, constituted waiver), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 911 , 989 A.2d 1074 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Brabham
(2×)
See State v. Nelson, 118 Conn. App. 831, 847 , 986 A.2d 311 (when considering claims of insufficient evidence, reviewing court must consider “the evidence [from trial and] . . . determine whether upon the facts . . . and the inferences reasonably drawn therefrom,” jury could have properly reached its verdict [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 911 , 989 A.2d 1074 (2010). 9 The loss of the trial exhibits, without adequate replacements, prejudices the operation of this appeal with regard to all of the defendant’s claims, including his claim regarding the insufficie…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Tinsley
(2×)
See State v. Goldson, supra, 178 Conn. 424–25; see also State v. Nelson, 118 Conn. App. 831, 853 , 986 A.2d 311 (two kidnapping charges arose from same act or transaction where oper- ative information alleged that crimes were committed on same date, in same location and against same vic- tim), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 911 , 989 A.2d 1074 (2010); State v. Crudup, 81 Conn. App. 248 , 252–53, 838 A.2d 1053 (first prong of double jeopardy analysis met where information charged that both crimes occurred during afternoon hours of same date), cert. denied, 268 Conn. 913 , 845 A.2d 415 (2004); Stat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jackson
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Nelson, 118 Conn. App. 831, 846 , 986 A.2d 311 (it was not abuse of discre- tion for court to grant one month continuance when defendant asked for two month continuance), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 911 , 989 A.2d 1074 (2010); United States v. Turner, 897 F.3d 1084 , 1101–1102 (9th Cir. 2018) (it was not abuse of discretion to provide shorter continuance than requested), cert. denied, U.S. , 139 S. Ct. 1234 , 203 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lewis
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Nelson, 118 Conn. App. 831, 848 , 986 A.2d 311 (burn marks and scars caused by defendant pressing heated tools on victim’s face and abdomen), cert. denied, 295 Conn. 911 , 989 A.2d 1074 (2010); State v. Alford, 37 Conn. App. 180, 185 , 655 A.2d 782 (1995) (child’s head injuries caused by defendant’s abuse); State v. Suarez, 23 Conn. App. 705, 711 , 584 A.2d 1194 (1991) (facial wounds caused by defendant striking victim in face with glass).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Luis Almedina
v.
Luis Almedina
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 10, 2010.
Mary Beattie Schairer, special public defender, in support of the petition., James A. Kitten, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Published
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 119 Conn. App. 46 (AC 29671), is denied.
[*912] Mary Beattie Schairer, special public defender, in support of the petition. James A. Kitten, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided March 10, 2010