green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1972 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1972
1999
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Primavera Familienstifung v. Askin
U.C.C. § 2-706 (1); see Bache & Co. v. Int’l Controls Corp., 339 F.Supp. 341, 349 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 469 F.2d 696 (2d Cir.1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vista Co. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.
See Bache & Co. v. Int’l Controls Corp., 324 F.Supp. 998, 1004-05 (S.D.N.Y.1971), aff' d, 469 F.2d 696 (2d Cir.1972) (Broker in whose name contract was made could bring action on behalf of customers under Rule 17(a).
cited
Cited "see"
North American Foreign Trading Corp. v. Direct Mail Specialist
See Bache & Co. v. Int’l Controls Corp., 339 F.Supp. 341, 351-52 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 469 F.2d 696 (2d Cir.1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Apex Oil Company v. The Belcher Company of New York, Inc. And Belcher New Jersey, Inc.
N.Y.U.C.C. § 2-706 comment 5; accord Bache & Co. v. International Controls Corp., 339 F.Supp. 341, 351 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd per curiam, 469 F.2d 696 (2d Cir.1972) (affirming on basis of district court opinion).
discussed
Cited "see"
American National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, Cross-Appellee v. Weyerhaeuser Company, Third-Party and Counter-Defendant- Cross-Appellant v. The First Jersey National Bank, Third-Party and Counter-Plaintiff
(2×)
See Bache & Co. v. International Controls Corp., 339 F.Supp. 341, 349 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd on opinion below, 469 F.2d 696 (2d Cir. 1974). 24 35 ILL.REV.STAT. ch. 26, Sec. 2-706(1) (1981), provides that a seller may, upon the buyer's wrongful refusal to accept delivery, resell undelivered or returned goods.
discussed
Cited "see"
American National Bank & Trust Co. v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
(2×)
See Bache & Co. v. International Controls Corp., 339 F.Supp. 341, 349 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d on opinion below, 469 F.2d 696 (2d Cir. 1974). 24 Ill.Rev.Stat. ch. 26, § 2-706(1) (1981), provides that a seller may, upon the buyer’s wrongful refusal to accept delivery, resell undelivered or returned goods.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
American Electric Power Co. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
See, e. g., Bache & Co., Inc. v. International Controls Corp., 339 F.Supp. 341, 347 (S.D.N.Y.) aff’d, 469 F.2d 696 (2d Cir. 1972); Auten v. Auten, 308 N.Y. 155 , 124 N.E.2d 99 (1954).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bache & Co., Incorporated, Appellee-Appellant
v.
International Controls Corporation, Appellant-Appellee
v.
International Controls Corporation, Appellant-Appellee
202.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Dec 15, 1972.
469 F.2d 696
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
BACHE & CO., INCORPORATED, Appellee-Appellant,
v.
INTERNATIONAL CONTROLS CORPORATION, Appellant-Appellee.
No. 202, Docket 72-1454.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Dec. 11, 1972.
Decided Dec. 15, 1972.
Howard T. Milman, Sullivan & Cromwell, Joel M. Miller, New York City, for appellee-appellant.
James A. Hourihan, Washington, D. C. (Hogan & Hartson, David A. Ludtke, Washington, D. C., Cahill, Gordon, Sonnett, Reindel & Ohl, David R. Hyde, Allen S. Joslyn, New York City, on the brief), for appellant-appellee.
Before KAUFMAN, ANDERSON and OAKES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
1
We affirm the judgment on Judge Levet's opinions below, 339 F.Supp. 341 (S.D.N.Y.1972); 324 F.Supp. 998 (S.D. N.Y.1971).