Gables by the Sea, Inc. v. Emmett C. Lee, Jr., Colonel, 498 F.2d 1340 (5th Cir. 1974). · Go Syfert
Gables by the Sea, Inc. v. Emmett C. Lee, Jr., Colonel, 498 F.2d 1340 (5th Cir. 1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Delaware River Port Authority v. Tiemann (njd, 1975-11-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Delaware River Port Authority v. Tiemann
D.N.J. · 1975 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Gables By The Sea, Inc. v. Lee, 365 F.Supp. 826, 831 (S.D.Fla.1973), aff'd 498 F.2d 1340 (5th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1105 , 95 S.Ct. 775 (1975) ; Citizens Airport Committee v. Volpe, 351 F.Supp. 52, 57 (B.D.Va.1972). 20 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gables by the Sea, Inc.
v.
Emmett C. Lee, Jr., Colonel
1340.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Aug 2, 1974.
498 F.2d 1340
Published

498 F.2d 1340

GABLES BY THE SEA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Emmett C. LEE, Jr., Colonel, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 74-1028 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431

F.2d 409, Part I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

July 9, 1974, Rehearing Denied Aug. 2, 1974.

Allan M. Glaser, Marion E. Sibley, Miami Beach, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.

Robert W. Rust, U.S. Atty., Robert Reynolds, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for defendants-appellees.

Parker D. Thomson, Sanford L. Bohrer, Miami, Fla., for Audubon Societies.

Wallace H. Johnson, Carl Strass, Edward J. Shawaker, Attys., James R. Walpole, U.S. Dept. of Justice Washington, D.C., for intervenor.

Before GEWIN, GODBOLD and CLARK, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:

1

In this case, Gables by the Sea, Inc., seeks reversal of the district court's order granting summary judgment to the appellees. After giving full consideration to the briefs, trial record, and the district court opinion, 365 F.Supp. 826, we discern no valid basis for reversal under the facts disclosed by the record in this case. Moreover, our recent opinion in Di Vosta Rentals, Inc. v. Lee, 488 F.2d 674 (5th Cir. 1973), demonstrates to us that appellant's contentions are without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.