Beecham v. Catlin, 515 F.2d 504 (2d Cir. 1975). · Go Syfert
Search
Beecham v. Catlin, 515 F.2d 504 (2d Cir. 1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“where the issues in an action for a declaratory judgment parallel and duplicate the issues appropriately before the arbitrators, the court may dismiss the action or deny all relief, or declare and enforce defendant's rights to arbitrate.”
67 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Tannatt v. Varonis Systems, Inc. (mad, 2019-02-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Tannatt v. Varonis Systems, Inc.
D. Mass. · 2019 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
where the issues in an action for a declaratory judgment parallel and duplicate the issues appropriately before the arbitrators, the court may dismiss the action or deny all relief, or declare and enforce defendant's rights to arbitrate.
cited Cited "see" Burmah Oil Tankers, Ltd. v. Trisun Tankers, Ltd.
S.D.N.Y. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Aeronaves de Mexico, S.A. v. Triangle Aviation Services, 389 F.Supp. 1388, 1390 (S.D.N.Y.1974), aff’d, 515 F.2d 504 (2d Cir.1975). 7 .
discussed Cited "see" Kuhlmeier v. Hazelwood School District
8th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bayer v. Kinzler, 383 F.Supp. 1164 (E.D.N.Y.), aff'd without opinion, 515 F.2d 504 (2nd Cir.1975); Reineke v. Cobb County School District, 484 F.Supp. 1252 (N.D.Ga.1980). 28 Given that Spectrum is a public forum entitled to some first amendment protection, the question then is the extent of this protection.
cited Cited "see" Kuhlmeier v. Hazelwood School District
8th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bayer v. Kinzler, 383 F.Supp. 1164 (E.D.N.Y.), aff'd without opinion, 515 F.2d 504 (2nd Cir.1975); Reineke v. Cobb County School District, 484 F.Supp. 1252 (N.D.Ga.1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gund, Inc. v. Russ Berrie and Co., Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, e.g., Arrow Novelty Co. v. EnCo National Corp., 393 F.Supp. 157, 160 (S.D.N.Y.1974), aff'd, 515 F.2d 504 (2d Cir.1975) (“The defendant’s expression of the idea, i.e., the specific layout and design of the tray, bears such a remarkable resemblance to plaintiff’s expression of the idea as to render the inference of copying inescapable and the contention of independent creation unbelievable.”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Beecham
v.
Catlin
75-7034.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Apr 18, 1975.
515 F.2d 504
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 68%
Citer courts: D. Massachusetts (1)

515 F.2d 504

Beecham
v.
Catlin

75-7034

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit

4/18/75

1

D.Vt.

AFFIRMED