green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Caisson Corporation v. Ingersoll-Rand Company
Similarly, in Weaver v. Ford Motor Co., 382 F.Supp. 1068 (E.D.Pa.1974), aff’d, 515 F.2d 506, 507 (3d Cir. 1975), the district court denied a motion for a new trial, because a valid objection to the admission of testimony was not raised at trial but only when a motion for a new trial was made.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Matter of Reading Co.
And in its CNJ decision, the Court of Appeals expressly recognized the right of the Government to challenge deferred interline payments when “such payments would jeopardize CNJ’s continued operations, In re Central Railroad of New Jersey, supra note 1, slip op. at 55. 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Whitehead v. American Motors Sales Corp.
(2×)
Endicott v. Nissan Motor Corp., 73 Cal. App.3d 917 , 141 Cal. Rptr. 95 (1977); Culpepper v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., 33 Cal. App.3d 510 , 109 Cal. Rptr. 110 (1973); Jackson v. Fletcher, 647 F.2d 1020 (10th Cir.1981); Renfro Hosiery Mills Co. v. National Cash Register Co., 552 F.2d 1061 (4th Cir.1977); see Weaver v. Ford Motor Co., 382 F. Supp. 1068 (E.D.Pa. 1974), aff'd, 515 F.2d 506 , 507 (3d Cir.1975) (without published opinion); see also Collins v. B.F.
discussed
Cited "see"
Coastal States Marketing, Inc. And Valero Energy Corporation, Cross-Appellees v. Nelson Bunker Hunt, Cross-Appellants
See Hunt v. A Cargo of Petroleum Products Laden on Steam Tanker Hilda, 378 F.Supp. 701 (E.D.Pa.1974), aff’d mem., 515 F.2d 506 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 869 , 96 S.Ct. 132 , 46 L.Ed.2d 98 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Matter of Reading Company
See In re Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, 515 F.2d 506 (3d Cir., filed May 9, 1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, in the Matter Of
74-2202.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
May 9, 1975.
515 F.2d 506
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, In the Matter of
74-2202
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Third Circuit
5/9/75
1
D.N.J.
VACATED AND REMANDED