green
Positive treatment
2.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Anderson v. Farm Bur. Mut. Ins. Co. of Idaho
See Dupont Glore Forgan Incorporated v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, 428 F.Supp. 1297 (S.D.N.Y.1977), affirmed without opinion, 578 F.2d 1367 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 970 , 99 S.Ct. 465 , 58 L.Ed.2d 431 ; Kent v. Northern California Regional Office of the American Friends Services Committee, 497 F.2d 1325 (9th Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Watson v. Ray
See George v. Parry, 77 P.R.D. 421, 424 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d 578 F.2d 1367 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978); Held v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co., 64 F.R.D. 346, 347-48 (S.D.Tex.1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Ingram v. Madison Square Garden Center, Inc.
See George v. Parry, 77 F.R.D. 421 (S.D.N.Y.1978), affirmed, 578 F.2d 1367 (2d Cir. 1978) (oral opinion).
discussed
Cited "see"
Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co.
See DuPont Glore Forgan Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 437 F.Supp. 1104, 1115-16 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff’d, 578 F.2d 1367 (2d Cir. 1978); Chastain v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 401 F.Supp. 151, 160 (D.D.C.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Continental Cablevision of Ohio, Inc. v. American Electric Power Company
See also DuPont Glore Forgan, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 437 F.Supp. 1104, 1130 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff’d, 578 F.2d 1367 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 970 , 99 S.Ct. 465 , 58 L.Ed.2d 431 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wellman v. Dickinson
Munsey Trust v. Sycor, Inc., 457 F.Supp. 924, 926 (S.D.N.Y.1978) (MacMahon, J.); Feder v. Harrington, supra, 58 F.R.D. at 174-75 ; see also George v. Parry, 77 F.R.D. 421, 424 (S.D.N.Y.) (MacMahon, J.), aff’d, 578 F.2d 1367 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Golemme
v.
Board of Trustees of Taxicab Pension Fund
v.
Board of Trustees of Taxicab Pension Fund
77-7535.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Mar 22, 1978.
578 F.2d 1367
Published
Golemme
v.
Board of Trustees of Taxicab Pension Fund
No. 77-7535
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
3/22/78
1
S.D.N.Y.
2
AFFIRMED[*]
*
Oral opinion delivered in open court in the belief that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. An oral opinion or a summary order is not citable as precedent. Local Rule Sec. 0.23