United States v. Kerpen, 578 F.2d 1371 (2d Cir. 1978). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Kerpen, 578 F.2d 1371 (2d Cir. 1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
73 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 18 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Keystone Insurance v. Houghton (paed, 1988-04-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Keystone Insurance v. Houghton
E.D. Pa. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See County of Cook v. Berger, 648 F.Supp. 433 (N.D.Ill.1986) (relying on US. v. Field, 432 F.Supp. 55, 59 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff'd mem., 578 F.2d 1371 (2d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 43 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978)); accord Charter Oak Ins.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Castellano
S.D.N.Y. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Field, 432 F.Supp. 55, 59 (S.D.N.Y.1977) (Lasker, J.), summarily affd, 578 F.2d 1371 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 43 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Charles T. Walsh and Bowe, Walsh & Associates
2d Cir. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Field, 432 F.Supp. 55, 59 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff’d mem., 578 F.2d 1371 (2d Cir.), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 43 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Lawrence Gilbert Chesher (2×)
9th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Field, 432 F.Supp. 55, 59-60 (D.C.N.Y.1977), aff’d. mem., 578 F.2d 1371 (2d Cir.), cert, dism’d., 439 U.S. 801 , 99 S.Ct. 43 , 58 L.Ed.2d 94 (1978).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Sten Thordarson, Martin Fry, Craig Dunbar, Martin Salgado, and Charles Wise (2×)
9th Cir. · 1981 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Field, 432 F.Supp. 55, 57-58 (S.D.N.Y.1977), aff'd, 578 F.2d 1371 (2d Cir. 1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Kerpen
78-1091.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jun 2, 1978.
578 F.2d 1371
Published

578 F.2d 1371

U. S.
v.
Kerpen

No. 78-1091

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

6/2/78

1

D.Conn.

2

AFFIRMED[*]

*

Oral opinion delivered in open court in the belief that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. An oral opinion or a summary order is not citable as precedent. Local Rule Sec. 0.23