green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Knight Ex Rel. Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
See also Aretz v. United States, 604 F.2d 417, 432 (1979), reh’g granted, 616 F.2d 254 (5th Cir.1980) (“The negligence of another party is not an intervening cause if the defendant had ‘reasonable grounds for apprehending’ the intervening negligence.”) (citing Milton Bradley). 9 Cf. Riesbeck Drug Co. v. Wray, 111 Ind.App. 467 , 39 N.E.2d 776 (1942) (finding no liability where there Were no “conditions or circumstances” indicating to the seller that the instrumentality would be used to take human life).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marion F. Cole, Personal Representative of the Estate of Deborah D. Eisenhut, Deceased v. United States
See, e.g., Aretz v. United States, 604 F.2d 417 (5th Cir.1979) (interpreting Georgia law), vacated, 616 F.2d 254 (5th Cir.1980), reinstated, 660 F.2d 531 (Former 5th Cir. Nov. 1981) (en banc); Toole v. United States, 588 F.2d 403 (3d Cir.1978) (interpreting Pennsylvania law).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Antonio Perez v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation
See also United States ex rel Barksdale v. Blackburn, 616 F.2d 254 (5th Cir. 1981) (en banc); Friendly, Is Innocence Irrelevant?
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America Ex Rel. Bruce BARKSDALE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee
v.
Frank BLACKBURN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee
78-2582.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Apr 15, 1980.
John Wilson Reed, New Orleans, La. (Court-appointed), for petitioner-appellant., Maurine Carroll, William F. Wessel, Asst. Dist. Attys., New Orleans, La., John S. Baker, Jr., Baton Rouge, La., for respondentappellee.
Coleman, Brown, Ainsworth, Godbold, Clark, Roney, Gee, Tjoflat, Hill, Fay, Rubin, Vance, Karvitch, Johnson, Garza, Henderson, Reavley, Politz, Hatchett, Anderson, Randall, Tate.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
BY THE COURT:
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc.
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.